Wire flash
ConflictOil falls more than 4% on report Pakistan pushing for new U.S.-Iran talks with China's backing
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
Oil prices dropped more than 4% on Friday after a report that Pakistan, with China's backing, is seeking to restart talks between the U.S. and Iran. Brent crude fell nearly 5% to $95.73 a barrel, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate dropped 4.3% to $88.27. Despite the decline, crude remains on track for a weekly gain of about 7-8% due to escalating conflict in the Middle East. The U.S. Central Command completed its 13th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, targeting military infrastructure. President Trump told Axios he is considering a 'massive attack' on Iran, larger than anything seen so far. Iran's Revolutionary Guard claimed to have attacked U.S. facilities in Jordan. Analysts note that geopolitical risks around the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea are keeping energy markets tight and inflation risks elevated.
Source report
An oilfield crew, contracted by the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), works a service rig during a state-funded oil well plugging operation in Midland, Texas, US, on Thursday, Sept. 25, 2025. Eli Hartman | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Oil prices fell more than 4% on Friday following a report that Pakistan is seeking to restart talks between the U.S. and Iran.
- Brent crude futures, the international benchmark, dropped nearly 5% to $95.73 per barrel.
- U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures fell 4.3% to trade at $88.27 per barrel.
Three sources told Reuters that Pakistan's effort to renew U.S.-Iran talks has the backing of China.
"The Chinese are unhappy because Iran's attacks on other Gulf states and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz are hitting their interests," a Pakistani government official told Reuters.
Despite Friday's decline, U.S. crude oil has gained about 7% this week, and Brent is up more than 8%, as fighting in the Middle East has sharply escalated.
U.S. Military Operations Continue
Overnight, the U.S. Central Command completed its 13th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, targeting:
- Military command centers
- Drone storage facilities
- Communication networks
- Coastal surveillance sites
- Maritime capabilities
Centcom said the strikes were intended to "further diminish the threat Iran poses to civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz."
"The international waterway remains open for transit despite recent attacks from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Commercial vessels continue to freely navigate the strait with U.S. military support," the military unit said in a statement.
"More than 50,000 U.S. service members are currently operating across the Middle East."
Trump Mulls 'Massive Attack' on Iran
U.S. President Donald Trump told Axios on Thursday that he was considering a "massive attack" on Iran after the conflict extended to a new battleground in the Red Sea. The president said the proposed strikes would be bigger than anything seen in the war so far, and that Iran has not "received enough pain yet."
"I am considering a massive attack. Bigger than ever before. I am close to making a decision. We are all set for it," he said in the interview.
The comments came after Trump said he would hold Iran responsible for further attacks by Yemen's Tehran-backed Houthis, following the militant group's claim that it had struck two Saudi Arabian oil tankers in the Red Sea.
"If they do this again, the U.S. will hold Iran responsible, in that the Houthis are a Surrogate and/or Proxy of Iran, and major military punishment will be inflicted upon Iran and, of course, the Houthis, themselves," he said in a Truth Social post.
Iran's Revolutionary Guard said Thursday that it had attacked U.S. military facilities at an American base in Jordan, according to state media.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio labeled Trump's approach to the Iran war as "a head for an eye."
Market Analysts Weigh In
In a Friday morning note, Daniela Hathorn, senior market analyst at capital.com, said growing instability around key shipping routes had rebuilt a "sizeable geopolitical risk premium" into oil markets.
"Investor sentiment has been dampened by continued disruption in the Red Sea, where attacks on commercial vessels have compounded concerns over global trade and energy security," she said. "Combined with tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, the developments have reinforced the view that geopolitical risks are unlikely to fade anytime soon, keeping energy markets tight and inflation risks elevated."
watch now VIDEO 6:21 06:21 Oil to hit record high: Prices may be too low with current escalation risk Access Middle East
Meanwhile, Giovanni Staunovo, a strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a Thursday note that markets may be overestimating the oil market's recovery from the conflict.
"We continue to expect the production recovery process in the Middle East to be slower than the market anticipates, as it requires..."
Source
US Top News and AnalysisWestern
Part of this Story
U.S.-Iran Agreement to Reopen Strait of Hormuz Sends Oil Prices Plunging