Wire flash
PoliticsRepublican senators push back against Trump's 50% tariffs on Canada
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
President Trump's new 50% tariffs on most Canadian goods, excluding energy, potash, fish, and critical minerals, are facing backlash from Republican senators. Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed skepticism, saying he hasn't heard the rationale. Senator Mike Rounds questioned the legal basis, noting the Supreme Court struck down previous tariffs. Trump justified the move as a response to Canadian trade 'discrimination' on cars, alcohol, and dairy, citing Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act. Senators Rounds and Bill Cassidy warned the tariffs would raise prices for American consumers amid rising inflation. Senator Susan Collins, in a tough reelection campaign in Maine, highlighted the intertwined economies of Maine and Canada. The article notes that while businesses successfully sued to overturn previous tariffs, Republicans in Congress previously refused to vote against them, raising questions about the upcoming midterm elections.
Source report
President Trump’s new tariffs on Canada are drawing backlash from lawmakers in his own party.
Republicans in the Senate are skeptical of Trump’s 50 percent tariffs on most Canadian goods, excluding energy products, potash, fish, and critical minerals. Senate Majority Leader John Thune told The Hill that he was skeptical and needed more information.
“I’m not a huge fan of tariffs as a general rule, unless there’s a specific purpose behind it, in most cases, creating a more level playing field for America’s businesses and our economy,” Thune said. “But I don’t, I haven’t heard the rationale for this one just yet.”
Senator Mike Rounds expressed concern about the Trump administration’s legal rationale for the tariffs, given that the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s previous tariffs months ago.
“My initial concern on it was what the purpose of it was, what the expectation is for, you know, considering a result a success,” Rounds told The Hill. “What is the goal of the tariffs? And I haven’t seen which provision within the law he’s utilizing.”
Trump announced a fresh round of tariffs on Canada Monday, defending his move as a response to trade “discrimination” from Canada on cars, alcohol, and dairy products. Trump is using Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act as legal justification, the Associated Press reports, citing an anonymous administration official. The tariffs apply to goods that the recently expired United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement used to cover.
Rounds said the tariffs could also affect the price of goods and hurt American consumers.
“The affordability side of this thing is something that we should all be concerned with,” Rounds told The Hill. “Right now inflation is not as low as it was; it is up. Fuel prices are very important that we try to maintain, bring down. International issues going on have caused it to come back up again. We need to get the price of gasoline back down again for the American consumer.”
“Tariffs of that magnitude will translate into higher prices for the American consumer,” agreed Senator Bill Cassidy, who is leaving Congress at the end of the year.
Senator Susan Collins, who is in a tough reelection campaign in Maine, told Politico Tuesday that she has “voted repeatedly against the Canadian tariffs.”
“Maine and Canada’s economies are very intertwined. A lot of our blueberries, our potatoes, our lobster, our lumber are harvested in Maine, processed in Canada and then come back. I don’t want to see the tariffs on the books,” Collins said.
Businesses sued the government over Trump’s previous tariffs, and they were eventually overturned, with refunds doled out to companies that applied for relief through U.S. Customs and Border Protection. But every time those tariffs were put to a vote in Congress, Republicans refused to overturn them. With the midterms looming, will that be the case again?
Editor’s Pick: Instead of Tariffs, Maybe Help Canada Put Out Wildfires?
Most Recent Post
Weeks after a preliminary peace deal with Iran fell apart, Donald Trump has turned his attention toward his next military conquest.
The Trump administration is reportedly considering taking military action against an Al Qaeda-affiliated group in Mali known as JNIM, according to several current and former U.S. officials who spoke with The Washington Post Wednesday.
Doing so would add to the president’s warmongering tally, marking the eighth nation he has ordered strikes on since he began his second term as president. The other affected countries are:
- Yemen
- Somalia
- Syria
- Iran
- Iraq
- Nigeria
- Venezuela
Trump has also ordered 66 strikes against small watercraft in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in an admittedly futile attempt to interrupt drug smuggling into the U.S., killing at least 221 people.
Source
The New RepublicWestern
Part of this Story
Even Republicans Want Nothing to Do With Trump’s Canada Tariffs