China Respects US Choice of "Super Intelligence" Over "Artificial Intelligence" in Diplomatic Talks
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated that China respects the US choice to use "super intelligence" instead of "artificial intelligence" when summarizing recent visit outcomes. The spokesperson noted that Chinese and US leaders held in-depth discussions on AI during their summit. China emphasized that as AI technology evolves, all parties should strengthen exchanges and seek consensus based on latest developments, reflecting diplomatic flexibility on terminology.
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Reports are grouped by semantic similarity and deterministic rules. Language models may assist titles, summaries, translation and cross-source analysis; the page reads the event directly, while its address stays stable when the title changes.
- Summary awaiting refresh
Summary awaiting refresh
Cross-source coverage
Reporting timeline
China's Foreign Ministry Responds to US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Over 'AI'
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US using the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' (AI) when describing the outcomes of a recent visit. The spokesperson stated that during the meeting between Chinese and US heads of state, AI was discussed in depth. Regarding the terminology, China acknowledges the US position and respects its choice of wording. The spokesperson added that AI technology is continuously evolving, and all parties should strengthen communication, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. The response indicates China's diplomatic approach of acknowledging differing terminology while maintaining openness to dialogue on the evolving technology.
Read sourceChina Respects US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Over 'Artificial Intelligence' in Talks
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US use of the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' when summarizing recent visit outcomes. The spokesperson stated that during the meeting between Chinese and US heads of state, the topic of artificial intelligence was discussed in depth. Regarding the specific terminology, China values the US position and respects its choice of phrasing. The spokesperson further noted that AI technology is continuously evolving, and all parties should strengthen exchanges, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. This response indicates China's diplomatic flexibility and willingness to engage on AI governance without directly endorsing or rejecting the US terminology shift.
Read sourceChina's Foreign Ministry Responds to US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Over 'Artificial Intelligence'
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US use of the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' during the announcement of recent visit outcomes. The spokesperson stated that Chinese and US leaders had in-depth discussions on AI during their summit. Regarding the terminology, China takes the US position seriously and respects the US phrasing. The spokesperson added that AI technology is continuously evolving, and all parties can strengthen exchanges, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. The response reflects China's diplomatic stance of acknowledging US terminology while maintaining openness to further dialogue on AI governance and development.
Show 3 older updatesHide older updates
China's Foreign Ministry Responds to US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Over 'AI'
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US delegation's use of the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' during a recent visit. The spokesperson stated that during the US-China summit, the two sides held in-depth discussions on artificial intelligence. Regarding the terminology, China values the US position and respects its choice of wording. The spokesperson added that AI technology is continuously evolving, and all parties should strengthen exchanges, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. The response reflects China's diplomatic stance of acknowledging the US preference while maintaining its own position on the matter.
Read sourceChina Responds to US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Instead of 'Artificial Intelligence'
In a press briefing on [date not specified], a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the United States' use of the term 'super intelligence' in place of 'artificial intelligence' when summarizing outcomes of a recent visit. The spokesperson stated that during the meeting between Chinese and US heads of state, the two sides had in-depth discussions on artificial intelligence. Regarding the terminology, China takes the US position seriously and respects its choice of wording. The spokesperson added that AI technology continues to evolve, and all parties can strengthen exchanges, deepen discussions, and seek consensus in light of the latest developments. The response reflects China's diplomatic stance of acknowledging differing terminology while maintaining openness to dialogue on AI governance.
Read sourceChina Respects US Use of 'Super Intelligence' Over 'Artificial Intelligence' in Talks
In a press briefing, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US delegation's use of the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' during a recent visit. The spokesperson stated that China takes note of and respects the US terminology. The response came after the two countries' leaders held in-depth discussions on artificial intelligence during their summit. The spokesperson emphasized that as AI technology continues to evolve, all parties should strengthen communication, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. The remarks indicate a diplomatic approach to terminology differences, focusing on continued dialogue and cooperation on AI governance.
Read source