China's Foreign Ministry responds to US use of 'super intelligence' over 'artificial intelligence'
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
On September 26, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed a question regarding the US use of the term 'super intelligence' instead of 'artificial intelligence' during the announcement of recent visit outcomes. The spokesperson stated that Chinese and US leaders had in-depth discussions on AI during their summit. Regarding the terminology, China takes the US position seriously and respects the US phrasing. The spokesperson added that AI technology is continuously evolving, and all parties can strengthen exchanges, conduct in-depth discussions, and seek consensus based on the latest developments. The response reflects China's diplomatic stance of acknowledging US terminology while maintaining openness to further dialogue on AI governance and development.
Source report
September 26 (Cailianshe) — The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson responded to a question regarding artificial intelligence during a press briefing.
Q: We have noted that in introducing the outcomes of the recent visit, the U.S. side used the term "super intelligence" instead of "artificial intelligence." What is China's comment on this?
A: During the meeting between the Chinese and U.S. heads of state, the two sides had an in-depth discussion on the issue of artificial intelligence. With regard to the terminology used for artificial intelligence, China takes the U.S. position seriously and respects the phrasing adopted by the U.S. side. As artificial intelligence technology continues to evolve, all parties may, in light of the latest developments, enhance exchanges, conduct deeper discussions, and seek common ground.
Source
财联社Eastern
Part of this Story
China Respects US Use of “Super Intelligence” Over “Artificial Intelligence” in Diplomatic Exchange