Wire flash
Supreme Court allows Trump admin to expand federal voter database ahead of midterms
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
The Supreme Court's conservative majority on Friday allowed the Trump administration to proceed with expanding the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system into a nationwide voter database, setting aside a lower court ruling that had paused the changes over privacy and accuracy concerns. The unsigned order permits the Department of Homeland Security to include Social Security and other information on every American in the database, which can now be used to check voter eligibility ahead of the midterm elections. The Court noted that federal law prohibits mass voter roll alterations close to an election, limiting the system's immediate impact, but states can still conduct individualized searches. The expansion stems from Trump's March 2025 executive order on election integrity. Dissenting Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan argued the changes likely violate federal law and risk disenfranchising naturalized citizens. Experts have raised concerns about data accuracy and potential purges of eligible voters. Other parts of the executive order, including a nationwide proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration, remain blocked by lower courts.
Source report
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday permitted the Trump administration to resume its efforts to create a nationwide database of purportedly eligible voters, setting aside a lower court ruling that had identified likely privacy and accuracy problems with the system.
Court Ruling
The unsigned order from the court's conservative majority allowed the administration to move forward with expanding the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system, maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. The expansion would include Social Security and other information on every American.
The order set aside a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which had paused the changes. The Supreme Court noted the database could be used to check voter eligibility ahead of the midterm elections.
"The order below prevents the Federal Government from using the program it believes is best suited to the task," the Supreme Court decision stated, referring to the appeals court ruling.
Limitations and Safeguards
The order also noted that federal law prohibits mass alterations to voter rolls in the weeks leading up to the election, which "limits the potential impact" of the SAVE system for this election cycle.
However, the decision clarified that states could still conduct individualized searches of the database ahead of the midterms.
Background
The alterations to the database stem from Trump's March 2025 executive order titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections."
- Previously, the SAVE system included only information about immigrants and naturalized citizens.
- The administration sought to combine that data with other government records.
- The goal was to allow mass searches of the system.
Lower courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, had paused that effort over concerns it would violate federal privacy and administrative law.
Dissenting Opinion
Friday's order drew a dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Jackson argued that the lower court correctly found that altering the system—created in 1986 to check immigrants' citizenship status—would violate federal law. She also pointed out that allowing mass searches made the system more likely to result in disenfranchising naturalized citizens.
"In my view, however, the harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the Government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take," Jackson wrote.
Related Developments
Other portions of the March 2025 executive order, including a requirement for proof of citizenship nationwide to register to vote, have been blocked by lower courts.
For months, experts have raised concerns about:
- The accuracy of the data in the database
- The possibility it could be used to purge otherwise eligible voters
The database alteration is separate from another executive order issued in March of this year, titled "Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections." Earlier this month, the Supreme Court blocked a U.S. Postal Service rule created as part of that order, which would have restricted mail voting.
Source
Policy – Roll CallWestern