Wire flash
PoliticsWest Point professor fired for refusing to omit human causes of climate change files lawsuit
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
Dr. Adam Kalkstein, a tenured geography professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, was fired after refusing an order from Brigadier General Shane Reeves, the dean of the academic board, to remove all references to human contributions to climate change from his teaching. Kalkstein, a conservative Republican, argued that omitting this information would be immoral, illegal, and detrimental to national security, particularly regarding Arctic resource competition. Six months after the meeting, his contract was not renewed. On August 26, 2026, Kalkstein sued West Point in the Southern District of New York, alleging violation of his First Amendment rights. The lawsuit claims the directive required him to defy science. The article frames this as part of a broader Trump administration effort to purge 'wokeness' from the military, contrasting with the Pentagon's 2021 conclusion that climate change exacerbates national security risks.
Source report
Here is the rewritten news content as clean, well-structured English Markdown.
West Point Professor Fired for Refusing to Ignore Human Causes of Climate Change, Files Federal Lawsuit
Publication Date: August 27, 2026
A tenured science professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York, claims he was fired for refusing to omit the human causes of climate change from his curriculum. He is now suing the institution in federal court.
Dr. Adam Kalkstein, a professor of geography, told The New York Times that Brigadier General Shane Reeves, the dean of West Point’s academic board, ordered him last year to remove all references to human contributions to climate change. According to Kalkstein, Reeves stated that President Trump, as commander in chief, sets the agenda on the issue. Kalkstein argued that such a change would be immoral and potentially illegal. When Reeves suggested Kalkstein resign, he declined, and the dean reportedly left the room.
“We’re only telling cadets part of the story. We’re lying to them, deceiving them. It would be like trying to teach the law without being able to even mention the Constitution,” Kalkstein reportedly said during the meeting, according to Stars and Stripes.
Six months later, Kalkstein—a tenured professor—was informed his contract would not be renewed. On Monday, he filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated. The lawsuit states that the institution’s order would require Kalkstein “to omit a massive, fundamental, essential component of the court and to defy science.”
According to The New York Times, Kalkstein is a conservative Republican who believes military cadets must understand the truth about climate change for national security reasons, not social justice. He wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth arguing that understanding the causes of climate change is critical for competing over resources in the Arctic and for understanding why sea ice is melting.
Hegseth, along with the broader Trump administration, is working to purge “wokeness” from government and military institutions, including any acknowledgment of climate change. Early in his tenure last year, Hegseth posted on X: “The @DeptofDefense does not do climate change crap. We do training and warfighting.”
This marks a significant departure from previous administrations. In 2021, the Pentagon concluded in a report that “increasing temperatures; changing precipitation patterns; and more frequent, intense, and unpredictable extreme weather conditions caused by climate change are exacerbating existing risks.”
Those risks remain, but the Trump administration is ignoring the science for financial and culture-war reasons. Professors like Kalkstein—and the education of America’s future military officers—are among the casualties.
Editor’s Pick
The Strait of Hormuz Isn’t the Only Major Shipping Route in Crisis
Iran War Exacerbates U.S. Military’s Critical Missile Interceptor Shortage in Europe
The Iran war has severely worsened the U.S. military’s shortage of advanced missile interceptors in Europe.
The shortage is “beyond critical,” as supplies have been quickly and unexpectedly drained by the conflict, according to a Europe-based U.S. defense official and a NATO official who spoke with the Associated Press on Thursday.
The deficit is most acute for the country’s Patriot missile interceptors. These systems are capable of shooting down ballistic missiles and aircraft but have been heavily relied upon during the war to counter Iran’s Shahed swarming attack drones.
The shortage stems from a supply chain problem:
- Iran’s drones are small, simple to manufacture, and cost roughly $20,000 each. They can be launched from almost anywhere and use GPS to find their targets. They are typically launched en masse to overwhelm opposing defense systems.
- Patriot missiles, by contrast, cost between $3 million and $4 million per unit. An entire Patriot battery system—including launcher, radar, and missiles—can cost as much as $1.1 billion.
Due to their enormous price tag, production of the highly sought-after Patriot system is relatively slow compared to demand. In 2025, Lockheed Martin produced 620 Patriot missiles. Iran, in comparison, is capable of producing about 10,000 drones per month, according to reports.
Source
The New RepublicWestern
Part of this Story
West Point Professor Sues After Firing Over Climate Change Teaching Ban