Wire flash
FDA Advisory Committee Votes to Recommend Six Peptides for Compounding Pharmacy Use
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
The FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) voted to recommend adding six peptides—BPC-157, KPV, TB-500, MOTS-c, Epitalon, and Semax—to the 503A bulks list, potentially allowing compounding pharmacies to produce customized medications. The vote follows growing demand for unapproved peptides promoted by wellness influencers, with U.S. imports from China doubling to $328 million in 2025. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has advocated for legal access, arguing the current ban creates a dangerous black market. The committee rejected emideltide for opioid withdrawal and insomnia. FDA scientists had recommended against the additions due to insufficient safety evidence. The FDA typically follows committee advice but final regulations could take months or years.
Source report
A group of peptides could be a step closer to becoming available through certain pharmacies after key Food and Drug Administration (FDA) committee votes last week.
Committee Vote and Recommendations
On Thursday and Friday, the FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) voted to recommend adding six peptides to the 503A bulks list for specific uses. The newly PCAC-recommended peptides include:
- BPC-157
- KPV
- TB-500
- MOTS-c
- Epitalon
- Semax
If the FDA approves adding these peptides to the list, compounding pharmacies could use them to make customized medications for patients.
The committee voted against recommending emideltide for opioid withdrawal, chronic insomnia, and narcolepsy uses.
The Growing Peptide Market
Most Americans are likely familiar with peptides like insulin and GLP-1s. However, in recent years, the market for peptides has expanded to include substances—such as amino acid chains like BPC-157—that are promoted by wellness influencers and health gurus, and far beyond what is FDA-approved.
As a result, a growing number of Americans are sourcing their peptides from China to skirt FDA oversight. As The New York Times has noted, "imports of hormone and peptide compounds from China roughly doubled to $328 million in the first three quarters of 2025, from $164 million in the same period of 2024," according to U.S. customs data.
Regulatory Status and Safety Concerns
Peptides are not illegal to use or own, but as the BBC notes, "they are not approved for human use, so are not subject to the quality controls that govern pharmaceutical manufacturing."
In 2023, under the Biden administration, the FDA classified a group of over a dozen peptides as Category 2 substances, which may "present significant safety risks," effectively banning their use.
Kennedy's Involvement
In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan he was a "big fan of peptides" and that he wanted to make several peptides legally accessible.
"We created the black market. And it's a very dangerous black market," Kennedy said on The Joe Rogan Experience.
In April, Kennedy announced that 12 of the peptides, including the seven voted on last week, would be removed from the Category 2 list and re-evaluated by "independent experts" for safety.
FDA Scientists vs. Committee Members
Before last week's PCAC vote, FDA scientists wrote in briefing materials that they would not recommend adding the seven peptides to the 503A bulks list. The FDA scientists concluded that "the peptides being considered lacked the necessary evidence to conclude that they were safe and effective for treating the conditions they were purported to help treat," according to The Hill.
Members of the PCAC, however, argued that they wanted pharmacies, not black markets, distributing peptides, reported TIME. According to the Associated Press, at least seven of the members had financial ties to the industry.
Next Steps
The FDA advisory committee's vote is not a final approval, but a recommendation. Although the FDA typically agrees with the committee, the agency would still have to finalize new regulations, which could "take months or years to draft," according to the A.P.
Source
Reason.comWestern
Part of this Story
FDA Panel Votes to Ease Restrictions on Unproven Wellness Peptides