Wire flash
PoliticsTrump admin civics contest accused of rigging against Sikh finalist
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
The family of 15-year-old Aangad Singh, a Sikh high school student from Connecticut, alleges he was unfairly eliminated from the Trump administration's Presidential 1776 Award civics competition due to his religious background and visible turban. Singh reached the final eight in Washington, D.C., but was not selected among the three white winners from Michigan, Washington, and Wyoming. After the televised broadcast, Singh and his family discovered that several of his correct answers—including identifying federal court jurisdictions under Article 3 and naming the 13th Amendment—had been marked wrong. The Department of Education initially refused to release scores, citing proprietary information, and later stated that judges' decisions were final and binding. The James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation, which scored the contest, did not respond to inquiries. The family is considering legal action, emphasizing they seek recognition for Singh's achievement rather than scholarship money.
Source report
The Presidential 1776 Award competition was established by the Trump administration to honor America's 250th birthday through a civics contest for high school students.
However, the family of 15-year-old Aangad Singh believes he may have been unfairly excluded from the competition's final due to his Sikh background and visible turban, according to NOTUS.
Key Details
Singh, a rising high school junior from Connecticut, entered the competition in February alongside other students nationwide. He scored well enough to reach the finals in Washington, D.C., at the end of June and made the final eight. But his elimination after that left his family—and many of his competitors—puzzled.
- The Singh family did not believe Aangad had performed poorly, but there was no live scoreboard.
- Other contestants told them after the competition that they were certain Aangad had won and were shocked he was not in the top three.
- When Aangad's mother, Ramandeep, asked a Department of Education official (which helped run the contest) for the final scores, the official told her that information was proprietary.
Discrepancies in Scoring
The Singh family waited until the competition was televised on CBS three weeks later. Aangad was shocked to learn that some of his correct answers had been marked wrong.
Example 1: Aangad was asked to provide four examples where federal courts have jurisdiction, as outlined in Article 3 of the Constitution. Two of his answers—"Parties of state and citizens of another state" and "Case with state and foreign nation"—were marked wrong. He showed his father a copy of the Constitution proving his answers were correct.
Example 2: During a lightning round, Aangad was asked, "Which amendment ended slavery?" and his answer was marked wrong. Initially, he thought his pronunciation of "Thirteenth" was poor and that his "th" sounded like an "f." However, he was reassured when TV subtitles confirmed he had said the correct answer.
Aftermath
After the round ended, host Mario Lopez interviewed each contestant before announcing the three finalists. Aangad spoke about being proud to share his knowledge of the country's founding principles. He then watched white contestants from Michigan, Washington, and Wyoming announced as the winners.
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and Access Hollywood host Mario Lopez meet with finalists of the Presidential 1776 Award outside the White House on June 10. Alex Wong/Getty Images
Singh's family believed he was robbed and considered taking action. To his mother and uncle, it appeared Aangad was being kept out of the spotlight—and a visit to the Oval Office to meet President Trump—because he was a brown child with a turban. They cared less about receiving a share of the $250,000 in scholarship money than about Aangad being recognized for his hard work.
- The Wyoming winner was a homeschooled girl later touted by the Department of Education for culture-war propaganda.
- The Washington state winner told Trump at the White House that she wanted to attend Hillsdale College, a politically conservative school, to which Trump said he could offer a recommendation.
Lack of Response
Aangad's father, Bhalindar, reached out to the Department of Education twice by email but has yet to receive a response. The department told NOTUS that the competition's questions were "developed, judged, and scored independently by the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation." NOTUS sent the foundation a detailed list of questions but also has not heard back.
Minutes before NOTUS's deadline, the Department of Education responded, stating that the competition's rules specified that judges would "exercise independent good faith judgement [sic]" in selecting finalists and winners, and that by participating, contestants "agree that the decision of the judges is final and binding."
Read The TNR Blue Book, our new newsletter on the Democratic Party: Democrats' Plan for Ending the Iran War
Most Recent Post
Daniel Siad, the French modeling agent who allegedly introduced dozens of young women and girls to sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, was found dead in his Paris home on Monday. He was 69. Siad was one of many...
Source
The New RepublicWestern
Part of this Story
Trump Officials Accused of Rigging Civics Contest Against Sikh Finalist