Wire flash
Top Democratic appropriator demands White House reimburse government for airing 'propaganda' ads
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
A controversy has erupted over the use of taxpayer funds for campaign-style advertisements promoting former President Donald Trump. A top Democratic appropriator is demanding that the White House reimburse the government for airing what they call 'propaganda.' Multiple news outlets report that lawmakers are calling for action against these 'plainly illegal' ads, which were funded with money originally allocated for border security and memorials. Legal experts have explained how the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity, could apply to these ads. Reports also indicate that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) leaders were cut out of the decision-making process for the ad buy. The controversy centers on the alleged misuse of government funds for political purposes, with Democrats seeking accountability and potential legal consequences.
Source report
Multiple news outlets report growing bipartisan backlash over the use of public funds for campaign-style advertisements.
- Top Democratic appropriator wants White House to pay for airing 'propaganda' — Politico
- Lawmakers call for action on ‘plainly illegal’ taxpayer-funded ads to promote Trump — The Guardian
- Legal expert explains how Hatch Act could apply to Trump's taxpayer-funded ads — Yahoo
- Campaign-style Trump ads use money meant for border security, memorials — The Washington Post
- CBP leaders cut out of Trump ad buy decision — NBC News
Key Developments
- A leading Democratic appropriator is demanding that the White House cover the cost of what she describes as "propaganda" ads.
- Lawmakers from both sides are raising concerns that the ads violate federal law, specifically the Hatch Act, which restricts political activity by government employees.
- Legal experts are weighing in on how the Hatch Act could apply to the use of taxpayer money for advertisements that appear to promote President Trump.
- Reports indicate that funds originally allocated for border security and memorials were redirected to fund these campaign-style ads.
- According to NBC News, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) leaders were not involved in the decision to purchase the ads.
Source
Top stories - Google NewsWestern
Part of this Story
White House defends taxpayer-funded pro-Trump ad campaign Democrats want pulled