Wire flash
Commentary: Berlin Left Party candidate Eralp should not be blamed for Red Help membership
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
In this commentary published by taz.de on September 30, 2026, author Marie Frank defends Berlin's Left Party (Die Linke) top candidate Elif Eralp against new allegations regarding her former membership in the Red Help (Rote Hilfe), a left-wing legal support organization classified as 'left-extremist' by the German domestic intelligence service (Verfassungsschutz). Frank argues that Eralp, a left-wing lawyer, should not be ashamed of her membership, calling the controversy a transparent attempt by conservative and right-wing forces to prevent a Left Party-led state government in Berlin. The author criticizes the Verfassungsschutz's assessment, stating the agency has been infiltrated by Nazis since the Nazi era and downplays right-wing terror while criminalizing anti-fascism. Frank asserts that membership in the Red Help, which is not banned, should not disqualify Eralp from office, contrasting her with former Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger, a former NSDAP member. The commentary concludes that anti-fascist lawyers pose far less danger to democracy than the electoral successes of far-right parties.
Source report
Commentary by Marie Frank
A left-wing lawyer was a member of a left-wing legal organization — where is the scandal? Elif Eralp has nothing to be ashamed of. Quite the opposite.
Published: September 30, 2026 — 8:18 PM
The efforts by bourgeois-conservative to right-wing forces to prevent a state government led by the Left Party in Berlin are almost laughable — so transparent and desperate do they appear. The latest "scandal"? Left Party lead candidate Elif Eralp was a member of the Red Aid (Rote Hilfe). Good heavens — a left-wing lawyer was a member of a left-wing legal organization — who would have thought?
As a member of the Red Aid myself, I say: That sounds commendable. After all, in times of a general shift to the right, it is more important than ever to stand up for left-wing activists who suffer from political persecution, police violence, and right-wing terror. Anti-fascism is currently under massive pressure, and solidarity is the most important weapon against it. Moreover, legal support for defendants is a matter of course and desirable in a democracy — even when it concerns leftists accused of crimes. Lobbying for one's own cause is also entirely normal in civil society, even when that cause is anti-fascism.
So why the uproar? Because the Office for the Protection of the Constitution classifies the Red Aid as "left-wing extremist." This assessment comes from an authority that, since the Nazi era, has been infiltrated by Nazis like no other — an institution whose job it is to downplay right-wing terror and criminalize anti-fascism. For leftists, assessments from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution — which should have been abolished long ago — are worthless. Even if, hypocritically, people still positively reference them when it comes to banning the AfD.
Even if the Office for the Protection of the Constitution sees it differently: Being left-wing or even left-radical, advocating for a different, better, more solidary society, is not inherently unconstitutional. The Basic Law does not stipulate that we must live forever in a capitalist, inhumane, dog-eat-dog society — even if some would like to make us believe otherwise.
The Red Aid is not banned. Therefore, membership should not be a disqualifying criterion for a government office, as is currently being suggested. It is a shame, then, that Eralp — in preemptive obedience — resigned from the organization a year ago and is now justifying her membership, instead of continuing to support the association.
Unlike CDU politician Kurt Georg Kiesinger, who was a member of the Nazi Party, Eralp has nothing to be ashamed of — and Kiesinger even became Chancellor. Quite the opposite: The commitment against the right, to which the lawyers of the Red Aid and its predecessor organization have been dedicated since the Nazi era, is something one would wish for from many politicians. If that were the case, the electoral successes of far-right parties would surely be kept in check. They pose a far greater danger to democracy than anti-fascist lawyers.
Marie Frank is an editor at taz, focusing on social movements, migration, class struggle, and social justice. She studied political theory but is more interested in practice.
Related Articles
- taz lawyer on the Red Aid: "Some criticism of the Red Aid smells of Putin's Russia"
- Uproar over the Left Party: "This is just the beginning" — Interview with sociologist Anton Schmidt
- Elif Eralp and the Red Aid: "Black accusations against red Elif"
38 Comments
Most read
- Cabinet reaches agreement: Government makes childless people pay for nursing care reform
- Union and state financial equalization: The wonder weapon against left-wing politics
- More expensive Deutschlandticket: How about a public transport discount?
- Elif Eralp and the Red Aid: Black accusations against red Elif
- New allegations against Elif Eralp: The Red Aid is more important than ever
- Unequal subsidies: Fuel gets cheaper, Deutschlandticket gets more expensive
Source
taz.de - taz.deWestern
Part of this Story
Berlin Left candidate Eralp’s past Rote Hilfe membership blocks coalition talks