Wire flash
TechU.S. Army replaces WWII-era metal ammo cans with polymer SixPAC, cutting weight by half
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
The U.S. Army is introducing the SixPAC, a polymer ammunition container designed to replace traditional metal ammo cans that have been in use since World War II. Developed over a decade at Picatinny Arsenal, the new 6.8mm round container weighs about 2.8 pounds, roughly half the weight of its predecessors. Officials cite supply chain vulnerabilities as a key driver, noting that only two U.S. suppliers existed for metal cans, while over 800 injection molders can produce the polymer version. The SixPAC is currently a proof of concept for the Next Generation Squad Weapon, with plans to eventually adapt it for legacy calibers like 5.56mm and .50 caliber. The Army is also exploring 3D printing as a stopgap solution for emergency ammo can production during surges, with research slated to begin next fiscal year. Extensive ruggedness testing is underway, including temperature extremes from -65°F to 160°F, drops from vehicles and ships, and user evaluations at multiple Army installations.
Source report
As supply pipelines become more risky and tenuous, the U.S. Army is rolling out what it calls the first major revolution in ammunition packaging since World War II. Officials also said they are looking ahead to a future where the military may be able to produce its own ammo cases at the point of need using advanced manufacturing.
In late August, the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Armaments Center in Picatinny, New Jersey, announced the development of the SixPAC — a polymer ammunition container designed to fit two to a case inside conventional wire-bound outer packaging. The container holds the 6.8mm rounds used by the service's upcoming Next Generation Squad Weapon.
Development of this lighter and simpler-to-manufacture polymer system has been in the works for roughly a decade, officials with Picatinny told Army Times in an interview. However, they added, the need for different materials has become more urgent recently.
Challenges with Metal Ammo Containers
"We've had a lot of challenges with metal ammo containers lately, because we just have a limited number of U.S. suppliers," said Jason Runell, senior scientific technical manager for packaging at Picatinny. He added that the Army had traditionally purchased from two makers and for a time was down to just one.
"You need an entire facility just to make one ammo can with all the presses and the dies and the welding equipment and everything. So it's a high barrier to entry and a limited supply."
By contrast, officials estimate that more than 800 U.S.-based injection molders can make the new packs, eliminating a major production bottleneck.
Weight Reduction and Soldier Feedback
At about 2.8 pounds, the new packs are roughly half the weight of their predecessors. In a release announcing the new ammo packs, Army officials cited feedback from soldiers who tested them in evaluation events between 2024 and 2025.
"Several service members pointed out that when aboard watercraft or aircraft, 'every ounce counts' and that the new system will allow them to carry more ammunition," the release stated.
Future Plans for Legacy Calibers
Eventually, officials hope to make the cases standard for all "legacy calibers" of small ammunition, including 5.56mm and .50 caliber. Officials noted that 7.62mm ammunition is typically packaged into a smaller case than the standard M2A2 ammo can and would require additional engineering.
"We're really using 6.8mm as our proof of concept to scale up and make sure that getting this new technology out into the hands of users is going to be well received," said Karl Weiss, supervisor for small and medium caliber ammunition and weapons packaging. "And there'll be a reverse demand to push this back … and the SixPAC, which could replace the M2A2."
Ruggedness Testing
Before that, the polymer shell must undergo more ruggedness testing to arrive at the final design. Multiple variants of the SixPAC will be put through an operational environments testing process that includes exposure to temperature extremes ranging from 160 to negative 65 degrees Fahrenheit, said Ed Lucas, design lead for the polymer ammunition container.
"We have various tests that simulate all of the different things that this will go through, whether it be being thrown off the back of a tactical vehicle. There's even testing for if it's dropped off a [ship]," he said. "There's a test that quantifies everything that this is going to have to do, and we've been very carefully looking at all those … to see if we can get the most efficient pack we can in soldiers' hands."
User testing will also be part of the process, with past tests conducted at:
- Fort Benning, Georgia
- Fort Campbell, Kentucky
- Fort Drum, New York
- An ammunition supply point in Germany
Additional user tests are expected to take place at Fort Campbell.
3D Printing as a Stopgap Solution
As the Army becomes more proficient at 3D printing, Picatinny officials are also looking to exploit that technology for emergency ammo can production. Runell said research on 3D-printed ammo containers is slated to begin next fiscal year.
"We want to first look into 3D printing for the purposes of addressing production surge. So, if we do have production surges where our ammunition packaging manufacturers can't keep up with demand, there may be a way to insert 3D-printed containers as a stopgap solution," he said.
Source
Army TimesWestern
Part of this Story
US Army unveils SixPAC polymer ammo packaging, first major update since WWII