Wire flash
US states accuse Meta of designing addictive features for teens, facing up to $200bn in penalties
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
Attorneys general from 29 US states have accused Meta of designing Facebook and Instagram features that addict children and teenagers, worsen mental health, and violate child privacy and consumer protection laws. The trial, filed in 2023, began with opening arguments in which California deputy attorney general Megan O'Neill cited internal Meta documents showing the company knew its platforms were addictive to teens but prioritized profits. The states have told the court that penalties could total about $200bn, though Meta previously argued the case could expose it to $1.4tn. The states are seeking civil penalties, restitution, and structural remedies, including deletion of personal data collected from children under 13 and removal of certain design features. Meta rejected the claims, arguing that internal records were taken out of context and that the company has taken meaningful steps to protect younger users, including shutting down over a million accounts of children under 13.
Source report
By: Shivam Mishra Read Time: 4 minutes
Overview
Attorneys general from 29 US states have accused Meta of designing Facebook and Instagram features that addict children and teenagers, worsen mental health, and violate child privacy and consumer protection laws.
The states have informed the court that penalties could total approximately $200 billion, though the final amount—if any—would depend on the court's findings and the remedies it orders.
The trial, stemming from a lawsuit filed in 2023, is expected to last six to eight weeks.
Opening Arguments
During opening arguments, California Deputy Attorney General Megan O'Neill stated that Meta "carried out a campaign to deceive, to mislead its users, legislatures, teachers and parents," according to CNBC.
O'Neill cited internal company documents, including one stating, "the young ones are the best ones," and another in which Meta acknowledged: "Teens are hooked despite how it makes them feel. Instagram is addictive," as reported by The Guardian.
"They knew," O'Neill said. "Time and again, profits won."
Allegations
The states allege that Meta violated federal and state laws, including:
- The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
- Various consumer protection statutes
They argue that features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, and beauty filters were intentionally designed to keep younger users engaged for longer periods.
Penalties and Remedies
After the first day of proceedings, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the case is focused on "civil penalties, restitution and distortion," rather than primarily on damages, CNBC reported.
"This is not a damages case," Bonta said at a press conference.
Meta has previously argued that the case could expose it to penalties of as much as $1.4 trillion. Bonta pushed back on that framing, noting that state attorneys general told the court last week that approximately $200 billion was a more likely figure.
"To be clear, we are not asking for $1.4tn dollars," he said, adding that the larger figure represented "the highest possible number that could ever be calculated based on that data" and that "It's a figure Meta estimated." CNBC reported that Meta disputes this claim.
Trial Leadership
Although the case was brought by a coalition of 29 state attorneys general as part of consolidated multidistrict litigation, lawyers from California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey are leading the trial.
Structural Remedies Sought
According to CNBC, the states are seeking structural remedies, including:
- Deleting personal data collected from children under 13
- Removing related algorithms and models trained on that data
- Eliminating certain design features from Meta's platforms
Meta's Response
Meta rejected the claims in full. During his opening remarks, the company's attorney, Paul Schmidt, argued that the internal records and email exchanges presented by state lawyers had been stripped of their broader context and selectively extracted from lengthier discussions, The Guardian reported.
Schmidt said the company had carried out multiple studies focused on younger users, framed around the question, "what can we do to support teens in this space."
He added that Meta has shut down over one million accounts belonging to children younger than 13 and said the company is "acting in a meaningful way to remove" underage users, according to The Guardian.
Meta Spokesperson Statement
"Rather than sticking to the facts or the law, the states have instead decided to chase an outlandish payout."
>
"The state AGs may call this a landmark case, but their limited claims are unsubstantiated and their financial demands are vastly disproportionate. The AGs offer no proof anyone in their states was misled, claim benign features like having an additional Instagram account somehow harmed their residents, and attempt to penalize Meta for industry-wide challenges like age verification."
In a public statement updated this month, Meta said it has introduced Teen Accounts across Instagram.
Source
Yahoo FinanceWestern
Part of this Story
Multi-state trial against Meta over youth social media addiction begins in California