Wire flash
Trump faces new legal challenges over executive orders restricting birthright citizenship
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
President Donald Trump's new executive orders restricting birthright citizenship, issued on August 6, 2026, have been met with immediate legal challenges from advocacy groups. CASA, Inc. and an anonymous pregnant immigrant named Barbara filed motions in federal court on Tuesday, seeking to halt the orders. The orders target 'birth tourism' and limit the Fourteenth Amendment's application to children of diplomats, alleged terrorist organization members, those involved in commercial birth transactions, and certain U.S. territory births. The lawsuits argue that the Supreme Court's June ruling against Trump's previous attempt prevents any revisions. Groups including the ACLU, NAACP, and Asian Law Caucus support the challenges. Aarti Kohli of the Asian Law Caucus stated the administration is 'throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks,' predicting another legal loss.
Source report
President Donald Trump's new executive orders restricting birthright citizenship have been met with court challenges from the same groups that successfully opposed his earlier attempt.
CASA, Inc. and Barbara (the pseudonym of an anonymous pregnant immigrant) each filed motions in federal court on Tuesday against the Trump administration, seeking to halt Trump's August 6 executive orders targeting "birth tourism" and limiting the application of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- CASA's motion was supported by the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.
- Barbara's motion is backed by groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP, Democracy Defenders, and the Asian Law Caucus.
The plaintiffs argue that the Supreme Court's June ruling against Trump's previous attack on birthright citizenship prevented any "revisions" regarding legal exceptions.
"If the President issues 100 orders seeking to create new exceptions to the sacred guarantee of the Citizenship Clause, all 100 will be equally illegal," Barbara's lawsuit states. "And nothing requires this Court to countenance the continued assault on this foundational constitutional principle or issue an endless string of EO-specific injunctions."
The new order restricting the Fourteenth Amendment directs government agencies not to "issue documents recognizing United States citizenship" to:
- Diplomats in the U.S.
- Children of alleged members of "terrorist organizations"
- People completing a "commercial transaction" to ensure a child is born on U.S. soil
- Certain people born in U.S. territories
The executive orders were already considered long shots to survive legal challenges, as they employ many of the same legal arguments that the Supreme Court struck down in June.
In a statement Tuesday, Aarti Kohli, executive director of the Asian Law Caucus, said the White House "is just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks."
"Immigrant communities know that our rights are on the line, especially when the government uses us as scapegoats," Kohli said. "The Trump administration already lost once, and it will lose again."
Read more about birthright citizenship: Trump Thinks He Can Defy the Supremes on Birthright Citizenship
White House Pushes for New Prosecution in Reflecting Pool Case
President Donald Trump continues to pursue allegations of vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, despite evidence to the contrary.
White House officials have directed the Department of Justice to consider launching another lawsuit against former U.S. Olympian David Hearn, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.
The request comes after U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro moved to drop the cases against Hearn and three other alleged vandals, following the discovery of evidence showing the pool's loose lining was caused by a "rushed and flawed installation process."
Even after Pirro walked the president through her trove of exculpatory evidence, Trump has continued to claim there is damning witness testimony and video footage. However, the DOJ has been clear: It cannot prove a thing.
A federal judge dropped the charges against Hearn but said he would wait to decide whether the case was dismissed "without prejudice," which would prevent the Trump administration from prosecuting Hearn for the same crime in the future.
This week, Representative Jamie Raskin—the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee—will formally demand that the Justice and Interior Departments turn over documents related to the charging decisions made in this case.
Read more about the Reflecting Pool: Trump Pushes Reflecting Pool Claim His DOJ Already Admitted Is Fake
Source
The New RepublicWestern
Part of this Story
Trump Signs Executive Orders Restricting Birthright Citizenship Despite Supreme Court Ruling