Wire flash
FinanceUS appeals court rules Chobani must face class-action suit over 'zero sugar' yogurt label
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
A federal appeals court ruled that Chobani must face a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging its 'zero sugar' yogurt label misled consumers. The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago reinstated the lawsuit, holding that plaintiffs may pursue claims under state consumer protection statutes. The FDA prohibits labeling a product 'zero sugar' unless it contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving. Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt contains four grams of allulose, a sweetener found in nature. The FDA argued that total sugars encompass all monosaccharides, including allulose, a position the court found valid. The named plaintiffs, James and Abigail Franco, said they would have skipped the purchase or paid less had they known the actual sugar content. Chobani disputed the ruling, stating its Nutrition Facts panel accurately shows 0g total sugar and 0g added sugar. The case was sent back to the district court in Chicago for further proceedings.
Source report
By: Cris Tolomia Source: Quartz
Chobani must face a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging the company misled consumers with its "zero sugar" yogurt label, a federal appeals court ruled on Monday.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago reinstated the lawsuit, holding that the plaintiffs may pursue claims that Chobani violated state consumer protection statutes. Each serving of Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt contains four grams of allulose, a sweetener found in nature.
FDA Regulations and Court Reasoning
The FDA prohibits companies from labeling a food product "zero sugar" or "sugar free" unless it contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving. Circuit Judge Thomas Kirsch, writing for a three-judge panel, was persuaded by an FDA brief arguing that the category of total sugars encompasses every monosaccharide, including allulose.
Judge Kirsch dismissed Chobani's argument that allulose falls outside the definition of sugar because the relevant FDA regulation only lists glucose, fructose, lactose, and sucrose. He wrote:
"The agency's brief is thorough, its reasoning is valid, and its position is consistent with earlier FDA statements about allulose."
The court also stated that it did not matter whether reasonable consumers would care about allulose. Judge Kirsch added:
"The Francos have alleged that consumers were fooled by Chobani's labels, and given the absolute promise on Chobani's products (sugar free), we do not find that allegation implausible."
Plaintiffs' Claims
The named plaintiffs, James Franco and Abigail Franco, alleged that after buying Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt at a Costco near Chicago in 2023, they would have either skipped the purchase or paid a lower price had they known the product's actual sugar content. A lawyer for the Francos declined to comment, according to Reuters.
Chobani's Response
The New York-based company disputed the court's conclusion. In a statement, Chobani characterized allulose as a non-sugar sweetener that occurs in nature and insisted its labeling is accurate.
"The Nutrition Facts panel accurately shows the yogurt contains 0g total sugar and 0g added sugar," the company said.
Next Steps
The case has been sent back to the district court in Chicago for further proceedings.
Source
Yahoo FinanceWestern
Part of this Story
Chobani to face class-action suit over zero sugar yogurt label