Wire flash
PoliticsDemocrats pick South Carolina to lead 2028 presidential primary calendar
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
The Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee voted to make South Carolina the first presidential primary state for the 2028 election cycle, scheduling its primary for January 22. The decision marks a significant shift from past schedules, prioritizing a state with a large Black voting bloc amid concerns over Supreme Court restrictions on the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina edged out Nevada, partly due to concerns about Nevada's ability to process election results quickly. The early calendar also includes Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan, and Virginia. Michigan replaced Iowa as the Midwest's early state, a notable departure from decades of tradition. The vote became tense when New Mexico was scheduled before Michigan, breaking a regional representation plan. The full DNC will vote on the proposed calendar in August. The new order elevates the South and Southwest while weakening Northeast and Midwest voices, significantly shaping the 2028 nomination race.
Source report
The state edged Nevada to be first, marking a major shift from past primary schedules
Publication date: July 24, 2026
By Emilio Perez Ibarguen, Aaron Pellish, and Lisa Kashinsky
Democrats voted to make South Carolina their first presidential primary state for 2028 — a significant shift from past election cycles, and one that prioritizes a state with a significant Black voting bloc.
The Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee on Friday scheduled the Palmetto State's primary for Jan. 22 and tentatively set the rest of its early-voting calendar in a surprisingly tense voting session. It will be followed by Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan, and Virginia.
Key Factors Behind the Decision
The decision to choose South Carolina over Nevada, another historic early state in contention for first place, came down in part to concerns about Nevada's ability to process election results quickly. Democrats said they were also looking to strengthen Black voting power in the South after the Supreme Court significantly restricted the Voting Rights Act earlier this year, which triggered redistricting efforts.
Notable Changes to the Calendar
- Michigan bested Iowa in the vote to be the Midwest's early state — a notable departure, as Iowa led the calendar for decades through 2020.
- New Hampshire, which has gone second on the nominating calendar in most past cycles, got bumped back to third place.
Tensions Emerge
The committee voted to add Virginia and New Mexico to host early-state primaries for the first time. But Democrats also proposed having New Mexico vote on Feb. 15, before Michigan, because Democrats there cannot move their primary unilaterally.
That is a major departure from a monthslong, widely agreed-upon plan from the DNC members to give one of the first four early states to the South, Northeast, West, and Midwest. The adopted calendar leaves the Midwest, a crucial region for Democrats' path to victory in 2028, represented fifth, and sparked frustration from a number of Midwestern members of the DNC.
"We had four regions for a reason, and we should be respecting that," Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) said during the meeting. "For too long, Democrats flew over the Midwest."
Next Steps
The proposed calendar will be voted on by the full DNC at its August meeting in Austin.
Impact on the 2028 Race
The slate of early nominating states — and their specific order — will significantly shape the path to victory for the field of Democrats eyeing the 2028 presidential nomination. It elevates the South and Southwest, which boasts large populations of Black and Latino voters, and weakens the voices of Democrats from the Northeast and Midwest.
How It Happened
Jane Kleeb, chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, said the mid-September deadline to move a state's primary date caught her and other members by surprise — and ultimately ended up costing Michigan an even more prominent placement.
"The rule was passed last year. A lot of us, because we deal with a lot of things, just forgot about it," Kleeb said. "We all thought we had until Jan. 15, which would have given more time to do it."
Dennis Speight, a DNC member from Texas who supported New Mexico getting moved into the early round of states, argued it would have gotten lost if it had been stuck between two larger states.
"We wanted to do mostly smaller states first, and did not want New Mexico, which we spent a lot of time adding to the mix to get to that sixth state, to get lost in that shock," Speight said after the vote. "If we had sandwiched New Mexico in between Michigan and Virginia, given their number of delegates, New Mexico might have gotten lost."
Reassurances for Michigan
DNC chair Ken Martin, who previously led the Minnesota Democratic Party, said he believes Michigan will still play a big role in selecting the next nominee.
"As a proud Midwesterner, I want to make sure that Michigan does not get overlooked," Martin said after the meeting. "When you think of all the other states and the number of delegates that will come out of Michigan and Virginia compared to the other states, there's no way they're going to be overlooked in that process."
And Dingell said after the vote that Michigan's role as the first large state on the calendar would prevent it from being overshadowed, adding that presidential candidates "are going to be there, they're going to have to talk about the issues."
Source
PoliticsWestern
Part of this Story
Democrats Pick South Carolina to Lead 2028 Presidential Primary Calendar