Wire flash
PoliticsUS Supreme Court grants rare summer certiorari in Jouppi v. Alaska
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Source reporting is collected, normalized, translated or condensed automatically when needed.
- Automatically published source-backed update
On July 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a rare summer certiorari grant in the case Jouppi v. Alaska (25-246), which had been conferenced on June 29 but not acted upon until nearly three weeks later. The case asks whether courts considering the Excessive Fines Clause should evaluate the gravity of the underlying offense in the abstract or the specific defendant's wrongdoing. The petition was filed in August 2025 and was held pending the resolution of Pung v. Isabella County, decided June 23. The unusual timing—a grant issued during the summer recess—prompted analysis from SCOTUSBlog, which identified only a few prior instances of summer cert grants, including Chafin v. Chafin (2012) and Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez (2021). The article speculates on possible reasons for the delay, including internal deliberations or calendar scheduling, and notes the author plans to publish an essay arguing for elimination of the Court's summer recess.
Source report
Over the summer, the Supreme Court typically issues miscellaneous orders as needed for individual cases. Toward the end of July and August, the Court usually releases a formal orders list, with most entries consisting of denials of rehearing or orders in pending cases. However, today's order list contained a surprise: a cert grant.
25-246 JOUPPI, KENNETH J. V. ALASKA — The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
Question Presented
The question before the Court is:
"Whether, in determining whether a fine contravenes the Excessive Fines Clause, courts may consider the gravity of the underlying offense purely in the abstract or should consider the gravity of the specific defendant's wrongdoing."
Unusual Procedural History
This case has an unusual posture:
- The cert petition was filed in August 2025.
- On November 25, the case was distributed for the December 12 conference.
- No action was taken for some time, suggesting a Justice may have been holding the case pending resolution of Pung v. Isabella County, decided on June 23.
- On June 25, the Petitioner filed a supplemental brief arguing that Pung "proved largely irrelevant to this case, plenary review continues to be warranted" and "casts no doubt on the cert-worthiness of the petition here." The Respondent did not file anything.
- The case was then conferenced at the June 29 cleanup conference.
- No grant was issued on June 30, alongside other cases.
Now, nearly three weeks later, the grant has arrived.
Possible Explanations
What happened in the interim? Several possibilities emerge:
- Did the Justices tentatively decide to grant on June 29, pending further internal deliberations?
- Did a Justice want to take one more look before granting?
- Did the Justices discuss the case over the summer break?
- Did they simply want to fill the fall calendar?
This process is highly unusual.
Historical Precedent
SCOTUSBlog identified several prior instances of summer cert grants:
- August 2012: Cert was granted in Chafin v. Chafin, a case distributed for the long conference that was granted earlier.
- August 2021: Two cases — Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez and Garland v. Gonzalez — were conferenced at the July 1 conference and granted about a month later.
Broader Context
Next week, I will publish an essay arguing that the Court should eliminate the summer recess, in part to avoid cert petitions piling up over the summer. Today's orders list provides a useful data point for that argument.
Source
Reason.comWestern
Part of this Story
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Unusual Summer Order