Why Commencement Speeches Are Meant to Be Forgettable Rituals
This analytical article from The Atlantic argues that commencement speeches are primarily ritualistic acts rather than opportunities for profound expression or lasting advice. While famous addresses by figures like Steve Jobs or Toni Morrison are remembered for their wisdom, the author contends that these are exceptions. For most graduates, the specific content of the speech is forgotten quickly, which serves the event's true purpose: bringing the community together in a shared moment of celebration. Experts cited in the piece, including David Murray of the Professional Speechwriters Association, suggest that the speaker’s role is to disappear into the background, ensuring the focus remains on the graduates, their families, and the institution. The article highlights that attempting to deliver cosmic wisdom often fails, whereas providing comforting sentiments and fulfilling the ceremonial formula succeeds. Even when speakers fail due to lack of preparation or inappropriate behavior, the ritual itself persists. Ultimately, the value of a commencement speech lies in the physical presence of the speaker and the collective experience of the event, not in the longevity or memorability of the words spoken.
Editorial responsibility
- No named human review is recorded for this page.
- Reports are grouped by semantic similarity and deterministic rules. Language models may assist titles, summaries, translation and cross-source analysis; the page itself is projected from evidence records.
- Current automated evidence projection