Victorian Firefighters Criticize Bureaucracy for Slashing Roadside Planned Burns

Country Fire Authority (CFA) firefighters in Victoria, Australia, have strongly criticized bureaucratic hurdles that they claim have reduced planned roadside burns by up to 90 percent over the past decade. CFA officials argue that excessive red tape and public pressure, described as political 'arse-covering,' hinder essential fuel management on council-controlled land and roadsides. This criticism follows new findings from Forest Fire Management Victoria (FFMVic), which revealed that areas subjected to persistent planned burns in the Otway Ranges experienced less intense and widespread damage during recent devastating bushfires. While firefighters emphasize that planned burns are vital for reducing fire impact and protecting communities, environmental groups urge a rethink of the strategy. Critics, including the Victorian National Parks Association, argue that broad-scale burning on public land may harm native wildlife and ecosystems, suggesting focused management near assets is more effective. The debate intensifies as authorities prepare for a potentially warm and dry season driven by an emerging El Niño forecast, highlighting the urgent need to balance ecological concerns with fire safety protocols.