WADA Faces Criticism for Delaying Tramadol Ban Until 2024
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is facing significant backlash after deciding to postpone the ban on the painkiller tramadol until 2024. Although WADA’s executive committee voted to add tramadol to the prohibited list, they opted for a delayed implementation to allow time for athlete education and communication. This decision has drawn sharp criticism from former England goalkeeper Chris Kirkland, who described tramadol as dangerous as cocaine and shared his personal struggle with addiction to the opioid. Player unions, including the Professional Footballers’ Association, have also expressed concern, urging that tramadol be treated as a drug of abuse rather than a performance enhancer to ensure a wellbeing-led approach to sanctions. While the ban will only apply to in-competition use, advocates argue this delay fails to address immediate health risks. The move contrasts with the Union Cycliste Internationale, which banned the substance in 2019. The delay aims to help dependent athletes seek support, but critics argue it prolongs exposure to a harmful substance already linked to severe addiction issues in professional sports.
Wire timeline
WADA Faces Criticism for Delaying Tramadol Ban Until 2024
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is facing significant backlash after deciding to postpone the ban on the painkiller tramadol until 2024. Although WADA’s executive committee voted to add tramadol to the prohibited list, they opted for a delayed implementation to allow time for athlete education and communication. This decision has drawn sharp criticism from former England goalkeeper Chris Kirkland, who described tramadol as dangerous as cocaine and shared his personal struggle with addiction to the opioid. Player unions, including the Professional Footballers’ Association, have also expressed concern, urging that tramadol be treated as a drug of abuse rather than a performance enhancer to ensure a wellbeing-led approach to sanctions. While the ban will only apply to in-competition use, advocates argue this delay fails to address immediate health risks. The move contrasts with the Union Cycliste Internationale, which banned the substance in 2019. The delay aims to help dependent athletes seek support, but critics argue it prolongs exposure to a harmful substance already linked to severe addiction issues in professional sports.
Sport