Vermont Lawmakers Advance Bill to Limit AI in Mental Health Care
Vermont lawmakers are advancing legislation, specifically bill H.816, to restrict the use of artificial intelligence in mental health care. The Senate approved the bill on second reading, aiming to ensure that licensed human professionals, rather than AI chatbots, make clinical decisions regarding diagnoses and treatment plans. The legislation defines the use of AI for therapeutic guidance as unprofessional conduct and a violation of the state’s Consumer Protection Act. However, it permits the use of AI for administrative tasks such as scheduling, billing, and transcription. Proponents, including Representative Daisy Berbeco and Lynn Currier of the National Association of Social Workers, argue that while AI tools offer benefits, they cannot replace human expertise and pose risks when marketed as wellness products that provide clinical advice. The bill also mandates the Office of Professional Regulation to provide recommendations on regulating AI use by mental health professionals by January 15. If passed, the restrictions would take effect immediately. This legislative move reflects growing concerns about the unchecked expansion of AI in sensitive healthcare sectors, seeking to establish clear guardrails to protect patients from potentially harmful automated interactions.
Wire timeline
Vermont Lawmakers Advance Bill to Limit AI in Mental Health Care
Vermont lawmakers are advancing legislation, specifically bill H.816, to restrict the use of artificial intelligence in mental health care. The Senate approved the bill on second reading, aiming to ensure that licensed human professionals, rather than AI chatbots, make clinical decisions regarding diagnoses and treatment plans. The legislation defines the use of AI for therapeutic guidance as unprofessional conduct and a violation of the state’s Consumer Protection Act. However, it permits the use of AI for administrative tasks such as scheduling, billing, and transcription. Proponents, including Representative Daisy Berbeco and Lynn Currier of the National Association of Social Workers, argue that while AI tools offer benefits, they cannot replace human expertise and pose risks when marketed as wellness products that provide clinical advice. The bill also mandates the Office of Professional Regulation to provide recommendations on regulating AI use by mental health professionals by January 15. If passed, the restrictions would take effect immediately. This legislative move reflects growing concerns about the unchecked expansion of AI in sensitive healthcare sectors, seeking to establish clear guardrails to protect patients from potentially harmful automated interactions.
VTDigger