U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Hawaii Gun Law on Private Property
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in *Wolford v. Lopez* that Hawaii's law requiring express property owner consent to carry firearms on private property open to the public is unconstitutional. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, held that the law violated Second Amendment rights under the 2022 *Bruen* precedent. The decision criticized the "Vampire Rule" and struck down Hawaii's default ban on guns in businesses like grocery stores and gas stations. Dissenting justices argued the ruling undermines state public safety powers and property owners' rights.
Cross-source coverage
Wire timeline
Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Concealed-Carry Restrictions on Private Property
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Wolford v. Lopez, struck down a Hawaii law that required concealed-carry permit holders to obtain explicit permission from private property owners before bringing firearms onto premises open to the public. Writing for the conservative majority, Justice Samuel Alito held that the law violated the Second Amendment by impeding the right to carry arms for self-defense. The ruling applied the 'history-and-tradition' test established in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), requiring that modern gun restrictions be analogous to historical regulations. Hawaii argued that pre-statehood Kingdom of Hawaii laws limiting public weapons carrying should serve as a historical analogue, but the Court rejected this, stating the Second Amendment applies uniformly nationwide. The decision raises further questions about the scope of acceptable historical analogues for gun restrictions and whether past discriminatory laws should be considered.
The New RepublicSupreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Concealed-Carry Law, Debates Historical Gun Regulation
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ideological split, struck down a Hawaii law that required concealed-carry permit holders to get explicit permission from property owners before bringing guns onto private property. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion in Wolford v. Lopez, stating the law violated the Second Amendment right to carry arms for self-defense. The ruling is the latest application of the history-and-tradition test established in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which requires gun restrictions to align with historical tradition. The court rejected Hawaii's argument citing early 19th-century Kingdom of Hawaii legal texts as historical analogues, asserting the Second Amendment applies uniformly across all states. The decision raises new questions about acceptable historical evidence for gun laws and whether past biases should factor in.
The New RepublicSupreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Concealed-Carry Law on Private Property
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ideological split, struck down a Hawaii law that required concealed-carry permit holders to obtain explicit permission from property owners before bringing guns onto private property open to the public. Writing for the majority in Wolford v. Lopez, Justice Samuel Alito held that the law violated the Second Amendment right to carry arms for self-defense, applying the history-and-tradition test established in Bruen (2022). The Court rejected Hawaii's argument using early 19th-century Kingdom of Hawaii laws as historical analogues, asserting the Second Amendment applies uniformly across all states. The ruling is the latest application of the Bruen test, which requires gun regulations to be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. The decision raises new questions about what historical evidence can justify modern gun restrictions and whether past biases should be considered.
The New RepublicSupreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii's 'Vampire Rule' on Concealed Carry on Private Property Open to Public
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Wolford v. Lopez that Hawaii cannot prohibit licensed concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns on private property open to the public unless the property owner gives express permission. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, while Justices Kagan, Jackson (joined by Sotomayor) dissented. The Court criticized lower courts and states that resisted the Second Amendment framework established in Bruen, particularly the 'Vampire Rule' which reversed the default presumption to ban guns unless 'Guns Welcome' signs were posted. The ruling also outlined the methodology of evaluating Second Amendment claims by first examining the plain text and then historical tradition. The case highlights the tension between gun rights and state-level public safety measures, with implications for similar laws in other states.
Reason.comSupreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii's 'Vampire Rule' on Gun Carry in Public-Access Private Property
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Wolford v. Lopez, ruling 6-3 that Hawaii cannot prohibit licensed concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns on private property open to the public unless the property owner gives express permission. Writing for the majority, Justice Alito criticized both lower courts and states like Hawaii for resisting Second Amendment precedents, particularly the 'Vampire Rule' that required affirmative consent (e.g., 'Guns Welcome' signs) before firearms could be carried. The Court clarified the 'text first, history second' methodology for assessing Second Amendment claims, finding that Hawaii's law clearly burdened conduct protected by the plain text of the amendment. The ruling also highlighted the impractical burden on citizens, tracing a hypothetical day to show the impossibility of seeking permission at every visited location. The majority opinion noted that Hawaii's bans covered large portions of land, including gas stations, grocery stores, and other routinely visited places. Justices Kagan, Jackson, and Sotomayor dissented.
Reason.comSupreme Court Overturns Hawaii's Restrictive Gun Law on Private Property Open to the Public
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Wolford v. Lopez that Hawaii's default prohibition against carrying firearms on private property open to the public is unconstitutional. The 6-3 decision, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, held that the law violated the Second Amendment by severely burdening the right to bear arms for self-defense. The Court found that Hawaii's law departed from historical common-law traditions, which generally allowed entry unless expressly prohibited. The ruling invalidates Hawaii's requirement for express property owner consent before carrying a firearm into businesses like gas stations, grocery stores, and restaurants. The majority argued the state failed to justify the burden by showing consistency with historical firearm regulation. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, arguing the ruling unduly restricts states' ability to protect public safety and ignores property owners' rights. The decision is seen as a significant victory for gun rights advocates and may affect similar laws in other states.
Reason.comSCOTUS Overturns Hawaii's Default Ban on Guns in Private Businesses Open to the Public
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Wolford v. Lopez that Hawaii's default prohibition on carrying firearms in private property open to the public is unconstitutional. The 6-3 majority, led by Justice Samuel Alito, found that the law violated the Second Amendment as interpreted in the 2022 Bruen decision. Hawaii had replaced its restrictive carry permit system with a law requiring express property owner consent before entering businesses like gas stations, grocery stores, and restaurants. The Court held that this regime severely burdened the right to bear arms for self-defense in daily life, departed from common-law defaults, and was not justified by historical tradition—citing that cited 18th-century laws targeted unauthorized hunting, not general carry in retail establishments.
Reason.comSupreme Court invalidates Hawaii gun possession law
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Hawaii law that barred gun possession on private property without the owner's explicit consent, in a 6-3 decision. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito ruled that the law infringed on Second Amendment rights, finding that colonial-era anti-poaching laws did not justify the modern law's broad restrictions. The decision is the latest expansion of federal gun rights following the 2022 Bruen ruling. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, accusing the majority of turning Bruen into a 'free-for-all' that overrides state legislative authority. Justice Elena Kagan argued in a separate dissent that Hawaii's trespassing statutes should have been sufficient to uphold the law. The case, Wolford v. Lopez, continues a series of Supreme Court cases broadening gun rights.
Roll Call