Untitled story
Untitled story
Cross-source coverage
Wire timeline
U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits
On June 30, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order that sought to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The ruling relied on the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause and the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent. The order, signed on the first day of Trump's second term, was part of a broader immigration crackdown but had been blocked by lower courts. Both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order's legality during April arguments. Trump reacted angrily, criticizing the justices on social media. The case tested executive power limits, with the court previously striking down Trump's global tariffs.
The Hindu: Latest News today from India and the World, Breaking news, Top Headlines and Trending News Videos.US Supreme Court Overturns Trump Plan, Upholds Birthright Citizenship
The United States Supreme Court has ruled to uphold the constitutional right to birthright citizenship, confirming that all children born on US soil are entitled to American citizenship. The decision overturns an attempt by former President Donald Trump to abolish this long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment. The ruling represents a significant legal and political defeat for Trump, who had made immigration restriction a key policy goal. The court's decision reaffirms the principle of jus soli, or citizenship by birth within a territory, which has been a cornerstone of US citizenship law since the late 19th century. The article, sourced from Die Welt and citing dpa and AP, notes that further details are expected shortly.
Nachrichten - WELTUS Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump executive order
The US Supreme Court on June 30, 2026 upheld the constitutional right to citizenship for individuals born in the United States, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order that aimed to end automatic citizenship for children of undocumented or illegally residing immigrants. In a landmark ruling in the case Trump v. Barbara, the justices affirmed that the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause grants citizenship to all persons born in the US, regardless of their parents' immigration status. President Trump attended oral arguments for the case in April, becoming the first sitting president ever to do so. The executive order, signed on his first day back in office on January 20, 2025, had been blocked by multiple federal district and appellate courts for violating the Constitution.
US Top News and AnalysisSupreme Court Rules Trump's Birthright Citizenship Restrictions Unconstitutional
The Supreme Court has struck down President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, ruling it unconstitutional. In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by the three liberal justices and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Court held that the 14th Amendment guarantees automatic citizenship to nearly all children born on U.S. soil. The ruling effectively blocks one of Trump's signature immigration policies and reaffirms the longstanding interpretation of the Citizenship Clause. The decision marks a significant legal defeat for the Trump administration and reinforces constitutional protections for birthright citizenship.
Just In NewsSupreme Court Rules Trump Cannot Restrict Birthright Citizenship
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, striking down one of his signature immigration policies. The order would have denied automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen or non-permanent resident parents. The majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause guarantees citizenship to nearly all born in the U.S., finding 'scant evidence' to support Trump's interpretation. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the text and history did not support such a guarantee. Justice Kavanaugh concurred in part, saying the order violated a federal statute rather than the Constitution. The ruling is a major rebuke to Trump, who attended oral arguments and had predicted economic harm from a negative decision. Approximately 255,000 children per year would have been affected by the order.
Forbes - Business