Return of AI-Generated Philosopher Jianwei Xun: Dependence on AI Tools for Thought
The viral AI-generated philosopher Jianwei Xun has returned with a new project titled 'Thinking with prompts,' according to an interview with Andrea Colamedici, the human ideologue behind the avatar. Xun, revealed in 2025 as a hybrid entity created by generative AI models like Claude and ChatGPT interacting with human minds, previously gained fame for the essay 'Hipnocracia.' This work critiqued how elites use technology to induce a 'functional trance' in masses, labeling figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk as promoters of 'perceptual imperialism.' The initial unmasking sparked intense debate among academics and media, with some dismissing it as a scam while others, including Wired, praised it as an audacious intellectual provocation. Colamedici defends the project as an experimental demonstration that philosophy requires new tools for construction. The article highlights the growing reliance on AI tools for thinking and production, reflecting broader societal shifts in how knowledge and content are generated. This development underscores the blurring lines between human and artificial intelligence in intellectual discourse, raising questions about authenticity, authorship, and the future of philosophical inquiry in the digital age.
Wire timeline
Return of AI-Generated Philosopher Jianwei Xun: Dependence on AI Tools for Thought
The viral AI-generated philosopher Jianwei Xun has returned with a new project titled 'Thinking with prompts,' according to an interview with Andrea Colamedici, the human ideologue behind the avatar. Xun, revealed in 2025 as a hybrid entity created by generative AI models like Claude and ChatGPT interacting with human minds, previously gained fame for the essay 'Hipnocracia.' This work critiqued how elites use technology to induce a 'functional trance' in masses, labeling figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk as promoters of 'perceptual imperialism.' The initial unmasking sparked intense debate among academics and media, with some dismissing it as a scam while others, including Wired, praised it as an audacious intellectual provocation. Colamedici defends the project as an experimental demonstration that philosophy requires new tools for construction. The article highlights the growing reliance on AI tools for thinking and production, reflecting broader societal shifts in how knowledge and content are generated. This development underscores the blurring lines between human and artificial intelligence in intellectual discourse, raising questions about authenticity, authorship, and the future of philosophical inquiry in the digital age.
Portada // elmundo