Purism CEO Alleges Trump’s 'Made in USA' Phone Is Actually Made in China
Controversy has emerged regarding the Trump Organization’s newly launched smartphone, which was initially marketed with a 'Made in USA' label. The device, priced at $499, was promoted by Eric Trump as a symbol of Donald Trump’s commitment to reviving American manufacturing and creating domestic jobs. However, Todd Weaver, CEO of Purism, the only US company known to fully assemble smartphones domestically, told CNN that he believes the device is actually produced by the Chinese manufacturer Wingtech. Following these allegations and an initial report by CNN on June 17th, the Trump Organization updated its website messaging. The explicit 'Made in USA' claim was removed and replaced with vaguer phrases such as 'American-Proud Design' and 'Born in USA.' The organization has not disclosed the specific location of production or full manufacturing details for the gold-colored phone. This incident highlights ongoing scrutiny of supply chain transparency and labeling practices within the tech industry, particularly when linked to high-profile political figures advocating for domestic industrial growth.
Wire timeline
Purism CEO Alleges Trump’s 'Made in USA' Phone Is Actually Made in China
Controversy has emerged regarding the Trump Organization’s newly launched smartphone, which was initially marketed with a 'Made in USA' label. The device, priced at $499, was promoted by Eric Trump as a symbol of Donald Trump’s commitment to reviving American manufacturing and creating domestic jobs. However, Todd Weaver, CEO of Purism, the only US company known to fully assemble smartphones domestically, told CNN that he believes the device is actually produced by the Chinese manufacturer Wingtech. Following these allegations and an initial report by CNN on June 17th, the Trump Organization updated its website messaging. The explicit 'Made in USA' claim was removed and replaced with vaguer phrases such as 'American-Proud Design' and 'Born in USA.' The organization has not disclosed the specific location of production or full manufacturing details for the gold-colored phone. This incident highlights ongoing scrutiny of supply chain transparency and labeling practices within the tech industry, particularly when linked to high-profile political figures advocating for domestic industrial growth.
TechNode