PLOS Updates Editorial Policy for Retrospective Health Database Studies
The Public Library of Science (PLOS) has announced significant updates to its editorial policy regarding research that utilizes publicly available health and social science databases. This initiative aims to uphold scientific rigor and editorial integrity by addressing concerns over data misuse, such as data dredging and salami slicing, where studies are artificially divided to increase publication counts. While acknowledging the value of these datasets for understanding prevalence and generating hypotheses, PLOS emphasizes that submissions must present legitimate research questions and make meaningful contributions to existing literature. Journal teams, in collaboration with Academic Editors, will now enforce stricter standards concerning the relevance of the research question and the age of the dataset. Furthermore, authors submitting observational studies are required to include a STROBE checklist alongside their manuscripts, adhering to long-standing guidelines. These measures reflect PLOS's commitment to adapting to the evolving publishing landscape and ensuring that published research remains robust, reliable, and accessible. The update serves as a directive to the academic community to maintain high ethical and technical standards in secondary data analysis.
Wire timeline
PLOS Updates Editorial Policy for Retrospective Health Database Studies
The Public Library of Science (PLOS) has announced significant updates to its editorial policy regarding research that utilizes publicly available health and social science databases. This initiative aims to uphold scientific rigor and editorial integrity by addressing concerns over data misuse, such as data dredging and salami slicing, where studies are artificially divided to increase publication counts. While acknowledging the value of these datasets for understanding prevalence and generating hypotheses, PLOS emphasizes that submissions must present legitimate research questions and make meaningful contributions to existing literature. Journal teams, in collaboration with Academic Editors, will now enforce stricter standards concerning the relevance of the research question and the age of the dataset. Furthermore, authors submitting observational studies are required to include a STROBE checklist alongside their manuscripts, adhering to long-standing guidelines. These measures reflect PLOS's commitment to adapting to the evolving publishing landscape and ensuring that published research remains robust, reliable, and accessible. The update serves as a directive to the academic community to maintain high ethical and technical standards in secondary data analysis.
The Official PLOS Blog