Permanent Games For Progress
This analytical article argues that despite unprecedented wealth, modern civilization lacks a compelling vision for the future due to institutional design failures. It critiques traditional philanthropy, noting that major foundations like Ford and Rockefeller have become bureaucratic and cautious following regulatory changes in the 1970s, rendering them ineffective for ambitious, long-term civilizational goals. The author proposes a new framework called 'permanent games' to convert private wealth into lasting progress. Unlike static institutions or profit-maximizing firms, permanent games are durable systems of capital, rules, and incentives designed to fund competition toward specific goals across generations. This approach preserves evaluation standards while allowing individual organizations to evolve or fail. By focusing on processes rather than preserving specific entities, permanent games aim to sustain momentum for grand visions, such as space exploration or disease eradication. The piece suggests that backing extreme outliers in technical vision through these structured competitive systems is more effective than current philanthropic models. Ultimately, it calls for a shift from inert capital accumulation to dynamic, goal-oriented systems that can withstand political shifts and maintain steady progress over time.
Wire timeline
Permanent Games For Progress
This analytical article argues that despite unprecedented wealth, modern civilization lacks a compelling vision for the future due to institutional design failures. It critiques traditional philanthropy, noting that major foundations like Ford and Rockefeller have become bureaucratic and cautious following regulatory changes in the 1970s, rendering them ineffective for ambitious, long-term civilizational goals. The author proposes a new framework called 'permanent games' to convert private wealth into lasting progress. Unlike static institutions or profit-maximizing firms, permanent games are durable systems of capital, rules, and incentives designed to fund competition toward specific goals across generations. This approach preserves evaluation standards while allowing individual organizations to evolve or fail. By focusing on processes rather than preserving specific entities, permanent games aim to sustain momentum for grand visions, such as space exploration or disease eradication. The piece suggests that backing extreme outliers in technical vision through these structured competitive systems is more effective than current philanthropic models. Ultimately, it calls for a shift from inert capital accumulation to dynamic, goal-oriented systems that can withstand political shifts and maintain steady progress over time.
Palladium