Palestine Action Ban: Peaceful Protesters Are Not Terrorists
This opinion piece from Middle East Eye, authored by a Liberal Democrat representative, criticizes the UK government's decision to proscribe the direct-action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organization. The author argues that this move, enacted under the Terrorism Act in June 2025, represents a dangerous erosion of democratic rights and the freedom to protest. Despite the High Court ruling the proscription unlawful due to its disproportionality, the government continues to appeal. The article highlights that over 2,700 predominantly peaceful protesters, including elderly citizens, priests, and retired officers, were arrested for merely displaying support. Approximately 700 individuals have been charged, though prosecutions are currently on hold. The author contends that labeling property damage as terrorism lowers the threshold for anti-terror legislation, risking the criminalization of politically inconvenient dissent. Furthermore, the piece condemns the broader Crime and Policing Bill for granting police excessive powers to restrict demonstrations. The text asserts that such measures strangle civil liberties and misuse counter-terrorism laws to suppress legitimate outrage regarding the conflict in Gaza, urging a review of legislation that targets respectable citizens rather than genuine security threats.
Wire timeline
Palestine Action Ban: Peaceful Protesters Are Not Terrorists
This opinion piece from Middle East Eye, authored by a Liberal Democrat representative, criticizes the UK government's decision to proscribe the direct-action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organization. The author argues that this move, enacted under the Terrorism Act in June 2025, represents a dangerous erosion of democratic rights and the freedom to protest. Despite the High Court ruling the proscription unlawful due to its disproportionality, the government continues to appeal. The article highlights that over 2,700 predominantly peaceful protesters, including elderly citizens, priests, and retired officers, were arrested for merely displaying support. Approximately 700 individuals have been charged, though prosecutions are currently on hold. The author contends that labeling property damage as terrorism lowers the threshold for anti-terror legislation, risking the criminalization of politically inconvenient dissent. Furthermore, the piece condemns the broader Crime and Policing Bill for granting police excessive powers to restrict demonstrations. The text asserts that such measures strangle civil liberties and misuse counter-terrorism laws to suppress legitimate outrage regarding the conflict in Gaza, urging a review of legislation that targets respectable citizens rather than genuine security threats.
Section Feed