Judge Rejects Pentagon's Revised Press Policy
A federal judge ruled that the U.S. Department of Defense violated a court order by failing to restore full press access at the Pentagon, despite introducing revised restrictions last month. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman sided with The New York Times, determining that the new rules did not comply with an earlier mandate declaring previous regulations unconstitutional. This decision represents a significant legal setback for the Trump administration and underscores ongoing tensions regarding First Amendment rights and government transparency. The ruling highlights the judiciary's role in checking executive branch actions concerning media access during national security operations.
Wire timeline
Judge Rejects Pentagon's Revised Press Policy
A federal judge ruled that the U.S. Department of Defense violated a court order by failing to restore full press access at the Pentagon, despite introducing revised restrictions last month. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman sided with The New York Times, determining that the new rules did not comply with an earlier mandate declaring previous regulations unconstitutional. This decision represents a significant legal setback for the Trump administration and underscores ongoing tensions regarding First Amendment rights and government transparency. The ruling highlights the judiciary's role in checking executive branch actions concerning media access during national security operations.
WSJ.com: US Business