India's CCI Rejects Antitrust Complaint Against Adani Group in Solar Tender
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has rejected a complaint alleging anti-competitive practices by Adani Group entities, Azure Power, and others regarding a solar power tender floated by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI). The complainant had accused Adani Enterprises, Adani Green Energy, and associated parties of violating competition norms through exclusionary practices and abuse of dominant position. In its order, the CCI observed that India's power generation market includes many significant public and private players, such as NTPC and Tata Power, meaning the Adani Group does not hold a dominant position. The regulator further stated that allegations of cross-subsidization and entry barriers lacked cogent evidence. Claims that tender clauses like the 'Green Shoe Option' restricted competition were also dismissed, with the CCI noting the complainant failed to prove the request for selection documents favored only large players. Additionally, alleged bribery claims were deemed not to qualify as abusive conduct under Section 4 of the Act. Consequently, the Commission found no prima facie case for investigation under Sections 3 and 4 and directed the matter to be closed immediately.
Wire timeline
India's CCI Rejects Antitrust Complaint Against Adani Group in Solar Tender
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has rejected a complaint alleging anti-competitive practices by Adani Group entities, Azure Power, and others regarding a solar power tender floated by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI). The complainant had accused Adani Enterprises, Adani Green Energy, and associated parties of violating competition norms through exclusionary practices and abuse of dominant position. In its order, the CCI observed that India's power generation market includes many significant public and private players, such as NTPC and Tata Power, meaning the Adani Group does not hold a dominant position. The regulator further stated that allegations of cross-subsidization and entry barriers lacked cogent evidence. Claims that tender clauses like the 'Green Shoe Option' restricted competition were also dismissed, with the CCI noting the complainant failed to prove the request for selection documents favored only large players. Additionally, alleged bribery claims were deemed not to qualify as abusive conduct under Section 4 of the Act. Consequently, the Commission found no prima facie case for investigation under Sections 3 and 4 and directed the matter to be closed immediately.
NDTV News Search Records Found 1000