Gay Couple Accuses MAGA Influencer of Provoking Assault for Viral Fame
David and Anthony Vullin, a gay couple involved in a recent altercation with MAGA influencer Ryley Niemi, allege that Niemi orchestrated the confrontation to generate viral content. The incident occurred on April 16 during an interview for Niemi’s show, Off The Record, regarding adoption rights. Tensions escalated when Niemi made controversial statements linking gay men to child molestation, prompting David Vullin to physically attack him. While Niemi claims his actions are politically motivated but financially lucrative, the Vullins argue he exploited their community for internet clout. David Vullin was arrested and charged with felony vandalism after destroying a camera during the scuffle. Niemi has launched a GoFundMe campaign citing physical assault and equipment damage. The Vullins’ lawyer contends that David acted to protect his family from targeted hate speech, criticizing a digital ecosystem that rewards controversy without accountability. This case highlights the intersection of online provocation, political discourse, and real-world violence.
Wire timeline
Gay Couple Accuses MAGA Influencer of Provoking Assault for Viral Fame
David and Anthony Vullin, a gay couple involved in a recent altercation with MAGA influencer Ryley Niemi, allege that Niemi orchestrated the confrontation to generate viral content. The incident occurred on April 16 during an interview for Niemi’s show, Off The Record, regarding adoption rights. Tensions escalated when Niemi made controversial statements linking gay men to child molestation, prompting David Vullin to physically attack him. While Niemi claims his actions are politically motivated but financially lucrative, the Vullins argue he exploited their community for internet clout. David Vullin was arrested and charged with felony vandalism after destroying a camera during the scuffle. Niemi has launched a GoFundMe campaign citing physical assault and equipment damage. The Vullins’ lawyer contends that David acted to protect his family from targeted hate speech, criticizing a digital ecosystem that rewards controversy without accountability. This case highlights the intersection of online provocation, political discourse, and real-world violence.
New York Post