Former Trump Attorney John Eastman Disbarred in California Over 2020 Election Interference
John Eastman, a former attorney for President Donald Trump, has been disbarred in California for his central role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The California Supreme Court upheld a State Bar Court recommendation, prohibiting Eastman from practicing law in the state and ordering him to pay $5,000 in sanctions. Eastman was identified as the architect of the so-called fake electors scheme, which aimed to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Evidence presented by the House January 6 Committee revealed that Eastman acknowledged the illegality of the plan yet continued to advocate for its execution. In response to the ruling, Eastman’s attorney, Randall A. Miller, announced plans to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Miller argued that the decision threatens the rule of law and violates First Amendment protections regarding attorney speech. This disciplinary action marks a significant legal consequence for individuals involved in attempting to subvert the democratic process following the 2020 election, highlighting ongoing accountability measures against key figures in the aftermath of the January 6 Capitol attacks.
Wire timeline
Former Trump Attorney John Eastman Disbarred in California Over 2020 Election Interference
John Eastman, a former attorney for President Donald Trump, has been disbarred in California for his central role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The California Supreme Court upheld a State Bar Court recommendation, prohibiting Eastman from practicing law in the state and ordering him to pay $5,000 in sanctions. Eastman was identified as the architect of the so-called fake electors scheme, which aimed to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Evidence presented by the House January 6 Committee revealed that Eastman acknowledged the illegality of the plan yet continued to advocate for its execution. In response to the ruling, Eastman’s attorney, Randall A. Miller, announced plans to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Miller argued that the decision threatens the rule of law and violates First Amendment protections regarding attorney speech. This disciplinary action marks a significant legal consequence for individuals involved in attempting to subvert the democratic process following the 2020 election, highlighting ongoing accountability measures against key figures in the aftermath of the January 6 Capitol attacks.
nbcnews