Editorial: U.S. Attorney Should Retry ComEd Executives After Appeal Release
The Chicago Tribune Editorial Board urges U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros to retry former Commonwealth Edison CEO Anne Pramaggiore and lobbyist Michael McClain. This call follows a surprising 7th Circuit Court of Appeals order releasing the two from prison and mandating new trials. Their original 2023 convictions for conspiring to bribe former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan were overturned due to a 2024 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Snyder, which clarified that federal bribery charges require proof of an explicit quid pro quo. The editorial argues that retrials are necessary to test evidence under this stricter legal standard. The case centers on allegations that ComEd provided no-work jobs worth $1.3 million to Madigan associates in exchange for favorable legislation. While two other defendants in the so-called ComEd Four did not appeal, Madigan himself remains imprisoned but has also appealed his conviction. The board emphasizes the importance of addressing the underlying corruption facts, where ComEd allegedly used its monopoly status to influence state regulators and legislators through patronage.
Wire timeline
Editorial: U.S. Attorney Should Retry ComEd Executives After Appeal Release
The Chicago Tribune Editorial Board urges U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros to retry former Commonwealth Edison CEO Anne Pramaggiore and lobbyist Michael McClain. This call follows a surprising 7th Circuit Court of Appeals order releasing the two from prison and mandating new trials. Their original 2023 convictions for conspiring to bribe former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan were overturned due to a 2024 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Snyder, which clarified that federal bribery charges require proof of an explicit quid pro quo. The editorial argues that retrials are necessary to test evidence under this stricter legal standard. The case centers on allegations that ComEd provided no-work jobs worth $1.3 million to Madigan associates in exchange for favorable legislation. While two other defendants in the so-called ComEd Four did not appeal, Madigan himself remains imprisoned but has also appealed his conviction. The board emphasizes the importance of addressing the underlying corruption facts, where ComEd allegedly used its monopoly status to influence state regulators and legislators through patronage.
chicagotribune