Debate on Habermas: Critical Theorist or State-Supporter?
This article analyzes the ongoing intellectual debate regarding Jürgen Habermas's relationship with Critical Theory and the state. Gerhard Schweppenhäuser argues that Habermas broke explicitly with Marx and the Frankfurt School in his 'Theory of Communicative Reason,' effectively abandoning critical theory for a universalistic communication ethics based on Max Weber. In response, Habermas’s biographer Stefan Müller-Doohm defends Habermas, accusing Schweppenhäuser of psychological projection and misrepresenting Habermas’s engagement with Horkheimer and Adorno’s 'Dialectics of Enlightenment.' The author critiques Müller-Doohm’s defense as authoritarian and dishonest, suggesting that Habermas’s interpretation of earlier critical works was philologically flawed. The piece challenges the notion that Habermas was not a state supporter, implying that his theoretical shifts aligned him more closely with established systems than his defenders admit. The controversy highlights deep divisions within philosophical circles about the legacy of the Frankfurt School and whether Habermas’s later work constitutes a betrayal or an evolution of critical thought.
Wire timeline
Debate on Habermas: Critical Theorist or State-Supporter?
This article analyzes the ongoing intellectual debate regarding Jürgen Habermas's relationship with Critical Theory and the state. Gerhard Schweppenhäuser argues that Habermas broke explicitly with Marx and the Frankfurt School in his 'Theory of Communicative Reason,' effectively abandoning critical theory for a universalistic communication ethics based on Max Weber. In response, Habermas’s biographer Stefan Müller-Doohm defends Habermas, accusing Schweppenhäuser of psychological projection and misrepresenting Habermas’s engagement with Horkheimer and Adorno’s 'Dialectics of Enlightenment.' The author critiques Müller-Doohm’s defense as authoritarian and dishonest, suggesting that Habermas’s interpretation of earlier critical works was philologically flawed. The piece challenges the notion that Habermas was not a state supporter, implying that his theoretical shifts aligned him more closely with established systems than his defenders admit. The controversy highlights deep divisions within philosophical circles about the legacy of the Frankfurt School and whether Habermas’s later work constitutes a betrayal or an evolution of critical thought.
Aktuell - FAZ.NET