Critique of Harvard's Grade Inflation Proposal in STEM Courses
This opinion piece responds to a Washington Post editorial from April 12, 2026, which discussed Harvard University's experiment with curbing grade inflation. The author argues that the original editorial overlooked a critical nuance in grading practices for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Specifically, the text highlights that in small, advanced higher mathematics classes, it is entirely plausible for every student to fully master the course material. The author challenges the practicality of imposing strict grading curves or caps, such as limiting the number of A grades to four in a class of ten students. The central question posed is what arbitrary or extraneous metrics professors would be forced to use to assign lower grades to deserving students who have demonstrated complete competency. The article serves as a critique of one-size-fits-all academic policies, suggesting that rigid anti-inflation measures may unfairly penalize students in rigorous technical fields where universal mastery is a possible and desirable outcome, rather than an anomaly.
Wire timeline
Critique of Harvard's Grade Inflation Proposal in STEM Courses
This opinion piece responds to a Washington Post editorial from April 12, 2026, which discussed Harvard University's experiment with curbing grade inflation. The author argues that the original editorial overlooked a critical nuance in grading practices for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Specifically, the text highlights that in small, advanced higher mathematics classes, it is entirely plausible for every student to fully master the course material. The author challenges the practicality of imposing strict grading curves or caps, such as limiting the number of A grades to four in a class of ten students. The central question posed is what arbitrary or extraneous metrics professors would be forced to use to assign lower grades to deserving students who have demonstrated complete competency. The article serves as a critique of one-size-fits-all academic policies, suggesting that rigid anti-inflation measures may unfairly penalize students in rigorous technical fields where universal mastery is a possible and desirable outcome, rather than an anomaly.
ashingtonpost