Court Rules Unaccredited VA Claims Company Overcharged Veteran $21,000
A North Carolina federal circuit court ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging a veteran $21,360 for disability claim assistance—five times the legal 20% cap on back pay. The company collected personal data, arranged medical appointments, and compiled evidence without VA accreditation. The class action lawsuit also alleges deceptive trade practices. The ruling highlights "claim sharks" and has spurred calls for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Cross-source coverage
Wire timeline
Unaccredited VA claims company charged veteran $21,000 in violation of federal law, judge rules
A North Carolina federal circuit court judge ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging veterans fees to help file disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The class action lawsuit, brought by veterans, also alleges deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law, though that part has not been ruled on. The judge found that the company's activities—collecting personal information, making medical appointments, compiling evidence, and tracking claim delivery—constitute acting as an agent, which requires VA accreditation. Under federal law, only accredited attorneys or agents can charge up to 20% of back pay, but Guardian charged a veteran $21,360 for a 100% disability rating, five times the legal limit. The case highlights concerns about 'claim sharks' and has prompted calls for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Task & PurposeUnaccredited VA claims company charged veteran $21,000 in violation of federal law, judge rules
A North Carolina federal circuit court ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging veterans fees to help file disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The judge found that the company's services, including collecting personal information, making medical appointments, and compiling evidence, constituted acting as an agent, which requires VA accreditation. In one case, a former Army intelligence analyst was charged $21,360 for a successful claim, far exceeding the legal 20% cap on back pay. The class action lawsuit also alleges deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law. The ruling is a rare legal examination of 'claim sharks' and has prompted renewed calls for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Task & PurposeUnaccredited VA Claims Company Charged Veteran $21,000 in Violation of Federal Law, Judge Rules
A North Carolina federal circuit court ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging veterans fees to help file disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The judge found that the company, referred to as 'Guardian,' prepared and presented claims on behalf of veterans without accreditation, which is required by law. Accredited agents can only charge up to 20% of back pay, but Guardian charged a former Army intelligence analyst $21,360 for a 100% disability rating, five times the allowed amount. The company also collected personal information, made medical appointments, and compiled evidence. The class action lawsuit also alleges violations of North Carolina deceptive trade practices laws. The ruling is a rare legal examination of 'claim sharks,' and advocates are calling for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Task & PurposeUnaccredited VA claims company charged veteran $21,000 in violation of federal law, judge rules
A North Carolina federal circuit court ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging veterans fees to help file disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The company, referred to as 'Guardian,' was found to have prepared and presented claims on behalf of veterans without the required accreditation. In one case, a former Army intelligence analyst was charged $21,360 for a successful claim, far exceeding the legal limit of 20% of back pay. The class action lawsuit also alleges deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law, though that part has not been ruled on. The ruling is a rare legal examination of 'claim sharks' and has prompted calls for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Task & PurposeUnaccredited VA claims company charged veteran $21,000 in violation of federal law, judge rules
A North Carolina federal circuit court ruled that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC violated federal law by acting as an unaccredited agent and charging veterans fees to help file disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The class action lawsuit, brought by veterans, also alleges deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law, though that part has not been ruled on. The judge found that the company's services—collecting personal information, making medical appointments, compiling evidence, and tracking claim delivery—constitute acting as an agent, which requires VA accreditation. In one case, a former Army intelligence analyst was charged $21,360 for a successful claim, far exceeding the legal 20% cap on back pay. The ruling is a rare legal examination of 'claim sharks' and has prompted calls for Congress to reinstate criminal penalties removed in 2006.
Task & Purpose