US Court Hears Challenge to Trump's New Import Tariffs
A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade is hearing oral arguments in a lawsuit seeking to overturn temporary tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump during his second term. The legal challenge, brought by 24 mostly Democratic-led states and two small businesses, targets a 10 percent global import tax enacted on February 24, 2026. This measure was introduced after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s previous, broader tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in February. Plaintiffs argue that Trump improperly invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary duties for balance-of-payments crises, to address routine trade deficits. They contend this authority is archaic and intended for monetary emergencies, not long-term trade policy. Oregon’s lawyer urged the court to block the tariffs immediately to prevent indefinite extensions. The Trump administration defends the action as a lawful use of executive power to correct the US trade imbalance. This case highlights ongoing tensions between the executive branch and judicial oversight regarding trade authority, distinct from other tariffs on steel and aluminum that remain unchallenged in this specific lawsuit.
Wire timeline
US Court Hears Challenge to Trump's New Import Tariffs
A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade is hearing oral arguments in a lawsuit seeking to overturn temporary tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump during his second term. The legal challenge, brought by 24 mostly Democratic-led states and two small businesses, targets a 10 percent global import tax enacted on February 24, 2026. This measure was introduced after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s previous, broader tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in February. Plaintiffs argue that Trump improperly invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary duties for balance-of-payments crises, to address routine trade deficits. They contend this authority is archaic and intended for monetary emergencies, not long-term trade policy. Oregon’s lawyer urged the court to block the tariffs immediately to prevent indefinite extensions. The Trump administration defends the action as a lawful use of executive power to correct the US trade imbalance. This case highlights ongoing tensions between the executive branch and judicial oversight regarding trade authority, distinct from other tariffs on steel and aluminum that remain unchallenged in this specific lawsuit.
Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera