Christian Ulmen Loses Court Battle Against Spiegel on Four of Five Points
The Hamburg Regional Court has largely rejected actor Christian Ulmen’s legal attempt to halt reporting by the news magazine Der Spiegel regarding allegations of digital sexual violence against his former wife, Collien Fernandes. The court ruled in favor of Spiegel on four out of five contested points, determining that the reporting was permissible under press law. The disputed articles alleged that Ulmen created fake profiles, distributed deepfake pornographic material, and engaged in virtual sexual conversations using Fernandes' identity. The judges found that Spiegel provided sufficient evidence to raise suspicion without claiming Ulmen personally produced the deepfakes, and that public interest outweighed privacy concerns given the prominence of the individuals and the severity of the accusations. Ulmen’s injunction was only successful regarding a claim about a missed court appointment in Palma de Mallorca, where the court found insufficient proof. The decision highlights the balance between personality rights and freedom of the press in cases involving serious criminal allegations against public figures. Ulmen retains the right to appeal the verdict within two weeks, while Spiegel may contest the single point decided against it. The presumption of innocence remains applicable throughout the ongoing legal discourse.
Wire timeline
Christian Ulmen Loses Court Battle Against Spiegel on Four of Five Points
The Hamburg Regional Court has largely rejected actor Christian Ulmen’s legal attempt to halt reporting by the news magazine Der Spiegel regarding allegations of digital sexual violence against his former wife, Collien Fernandes. The court ruled in favor of Spiegel on four out of five contested points, determining that the reporting was permissible under press law. The disputed articles alleged that Ulmen created fake profiles, distributed deepfake pornographic material, and engaged in virtual sexual conversations using Fernandes' identity. The judges found that Spiegel provided sufficient evidence to raise suspicion without claiming Ulmen personally produced the deepfakes, and that public interest outweighed privacy concerns given the prominence of the individuals and the severity of the accusations. Ulmen’s injunction was only successful regarding a claim about a missed court appointment in Palma de Mallorca, where the court found insufficient proof. The decision highlights the balance between personality rights and freedom of the press in cases involving serious criminal allegations against public figures. Ulmen retains the right to appeal the verdict within two weeks, while Spiegel may contest the single point decided against it. The presumption of innocence remains applicable throughout the ongoing legal discourse.
Aktuell - FAZ.NET