Checks and Balance: The Ugly History of America First
This article from The Economist's 'Checks and Balance' newsletter, authored by senior culture correspondent Jon Fasman, explores the historical roots and implications of the 'America First' ideology. Published as part of the 'America at 250' series, which examines the United States' evolution into a superpower, the piece revisits a period of intense isolationist sentiment in American history. The narrative spans from Woodrow Wilson's efforts to enter World War I to the onset of the Cold War, highlighting the tension between international engagement and domestic isolationism. The article references archival content on Prohibition and economic developments, alongside a reading list featuring works on the atomic bomb. By analyzing figures like Charles A. Lindbergh and the America First Committee, the text contextualizes modern political strategies within historical precedents. It suggests that contemporary grand strategies often fail in practice, drawing parallels between past isolationist movements and current political dynamics under the Trump administration. The analysis serves as a critical reflection on how historical isolationism shapes present-day foreign policy debates and internal political conflicts.
Wire timeline
Checks and Balance: The Ugly History of America First
This article from The Economist's 'Checks and Balance' newsletter, authored by senior culture correspondent Jon Fasman, explores the historical roots and implications of the 'America First' ideology. Published as part of the 'America at 250' series, which examines the United States' evolution into a superpower, the piece revisits a period of intense isolationist sentiment in American history. The narrative spans from Woodrow Wilson's efforts to enter World War I to the onset of the Cold War, highlighting the tension between international engagement and domestic isolationism. The article references archival content on Prohibition and economic developments, alongside a reading list featuring works on the atomic bomb. By analyzing figures like Charles A. Lindbergh and the America First Committee, the text contextualizes modern political strategies within historical precedents. It suggests that contemporary grand strategies often fail in practice, drawing parallels between past isolationist movements and current political dynamics under the Trump administration. The analysis serves as a critical reflection on how historical isolationism shapes present-day foreign policy debates and internal political conflicts.
economist