Can Sick Works Council Members Continue Their Duties?
A recent ruling by the Hessian State Labor Court clarifies whether works council members on sick leave can continue exercising their office. The court determined that incapacity for work does not automatically equate to incapacity for office, as the latter is a voluntary position governed by distinct works constitution rules. For non-exempt members, physical inability to perform regular job duties, such as strenuous labor, does not necessarily prevent participation in council meetings or consultations. However, if a member fails to communicate their willingness and ability to serve, they are considered temporarily unavailable, necessitating a replacement. Conversely, for works council members fully released from regular employment duties, incapacity for work generally coincides with incapacity for office, as their primary role is council work. The article emphasizes a practical dichotomy: non-exempt members require individual assessment of their capacity to serve despite illness, while exempt members are typically barred from duties when sick. Experts advise ill members to explicitly declare their intent to continue serving in writing to ensure employers facilitate their mandate. This distinction prevents the hasty conflation of medical leave with removal from representative duties.
Wire timeline
Can Sick Works Council Members Continue Their Duties?
A recent ruling by the Hessian State Labor Court clarifies whether works council members on sick leave can continue exercising their office. The court determined that incapacity for work does not automatically equate to incapacity for office, as the latter is a voluntary position governed by distinct works constitution rules. For non-exempt members, physical inability to perform regular job duties, such as strenuous labor, does not necessarily prevent participation in council meetings or consultations. However, if a member fails to communicate their willingness and ability to serve, they are considered temporarily unavailable, necessitating a replacement. Conversely, for works council members fully released from regular employment duties, incapacity for work generally coincides with incapacity for office, as their primary role is council work. The article emphasizes a practical dichotomy: non-exempt members require individual assessment of their capacity to serve despite illness, while exempt members are typically barred from duties when sick. Experts advise ill members to explicitly declare their intent to continue serving in writing to ensure employers facilitate their mandate. This distinction prevents the hasty conflation of medical leave with removal from representative duties.
Aktuell - FAZ.NET