EU Budget Proposal Sparks Criticism Over Propaganda and Censorship Concerns
This opinion piece from National Review criticizes the European Union's proposed budget allocations for the cultural and creative industries, arguing they facilitate propaganda and censorship. The author highlights the European Commission's plan to merge funding streams into a new 'AgoraEU' pot worth approximately €8.6 billion, which supports both film and news media. The article specifically targets the Citizens, Equality, Rights, and Values (CERV) programme, describing it as a taxpayer-funded mechanism for NGOs to promote specific 'EU values' rather than genuine democratic engagement. The author contends that initiatives aimed at preventing online hate speech are effectively tools for implementing censorship, asserting that free speech is not prioritized by Brussels. Referencing an Euractiv report on EU subsidies for Norwegian filmmakers as soft power, the piece characterizes these financial strategies as indirect propaganda. The analysis frames these developments as part of a broader 'post-democratic' trend in Europe, where government funding is used to shape public opinion and suppress dissenting voices under the guise of protecting rights and promoting equality.
Wire timeline
EU Budget Proposal Sparks Criticism Over Propaganda and Censorship Concerns
This opinion piece from National Review criticizes the European Union's proposed budget allocations for the cultural and creative industries, arguing they facilitate propaganda and censorship. The author highlights the European Commission's plan to merge funding streams into a new 'AgoraEU' pot worth approximately €8.6 billion, which supports both film and news media. The article specifically targets the Citizens, Equality, Rights, and Values (CERV) programme, describing it as a taxpayer-funded mechanism for NGOs to promote specific 'EU values' rather than genuine democratic engagement. The author contends that initiatives aimed at preventing online hate speech are effectively tools for implementing censorship, asserting that free speech is not prioritized by Brussels. Referencing an Euractiv report on EU subsidies for Norwegian filmmakers as soft power, the piece characterizes these financial strategies as indirect propaganda. The analysis frames these developments as part of a broader 'post-democratic' trend in Europe, where government funding is used to shape public opinion and suppress dissenting voices under the guise of protecting rights and promoting equality.
nationalreview