Bodycam Video Contradicts Police Account in Fatal Shooting of St. Louis Teen
Newly released body camera footage contradicts the St. Louis Police Department's initial account of the June 2024 fatal shooting of 17-year-old Emeshyon Wilkins. While police originally claimed Wilkins pointed a gun at officers, the video shows an officer shooting the teen in the back of the head as he fled on foot. The lawsuit filed by Wilkins' family reveals that the firearm found in his pocket was disassembled and incapable of firing. Attorney Al Watkins criticized the department for withholding the video for over a year, requiring federal litigation to obtain it. Following the release, the police department acknowledged that earlier information provided to the community was inconsistent with actual events and announced new protocols for reviewing body-worn camera footage before public statements. The incident has reignited tensions in St. Louis, recalling the 2014 Ferguson unrest. The involved officer remains on paid desk duty while the Circuit Attorney’s Office continues its review of evidence to determine potential criminal liability. The case highlights ongoing issues regarding police transparency and accountability in use-of-force incidents involving Black youths.
Wire timeline
Bodycam Video Contradicts Police Account in Fatal Shooting of St. Louis Teen
Newly released body camera footage contradicts the St. Louis Police Department's initial account of the June 2024 fatal shooting of 17-year-old Emeshyon Wilkins. While police originally claimed Wilkins pointed a gun at officers, the video shows an officer shooting the teen in the back of the head as he fled on foot. The lawsuit filed by Wilkins' family reveals that the firearm found in his pocket was disassembled and incapable of firing. Attorney Al Watkins criticized the department for withholding the video for over a year, requiring federal litigation to obtain it. Following the release, the police department acknowledged that earlier information provided to the community was inconsistent with actual events and announced new protocols for reviewing body-worn camera footage before public statements. The incident has reignited tensions in St. Louis, recalling the 2014 Ferguson unrest. The involved officer remains on paid desk duty while the Circuit Attorney’s Office continues its review of evidence to determine potential criminal liability. The case highlights ongoing issues regarding police transparency and accountability in use-of-force incidents involving Black youths.
AP News