US Appeals Court Blocks Contempt Case Over Trump Deportation Flights
A United States federal appeals court has blocked District Judge James Boasberg from pursuing criminal contempt proceedings against the Trump administration regarding two deportation flights in March 2025. In a two-to-one decision, the panel ruled that Boasberg’s actions constituted a clear abuse of discretion. The majority opinion, authored by Judge Neomi Rao, stated that the lower court’s order did not explicitly prohibit transferring immigrants into El Salvador’s custody, noting that criminal contempt requires violation of a clear and specific order. The case involved the deportation of 137 Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, based on alleged gang ties. Critics argued the move violated due process, while the administration defended its national security prerogatives. The ruling highlighted deep judicial tensions, with the majority comprising Trump appointees and the dissent from a Biden appointee. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche praised the decision as ending a politically motivated campaign against department attorneys. This legal resolution concludes a year-long clash over the executive branch's immigration enforcement powers and judicial oversight limits.
Wire timeline
US Appeals Court Blocks Contempt Case Over Trump Deportation Flights
A United States federal appeals court has blocked District Judge James Boasberg from pursuing criminal contempt proceedings against the Trump administration regarding two deportation flights in March 2025. In a two-to-one decision, the panel ruled that Boasberg’s actions constituted a clear abuse of discretion. The majority opinion, authored by Judge Neomi Rao, stated that the lower court’s order did not explicitly prohibit transferring immigrants into El Salvador’s custody, noting that criminal contempt requires violation of a clear and specific order. The case involved the deportation of 137 Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, based on alleged gang ties. Critics argued the move violated due process, while the administration defended its national security prerogatives. The ruling highlighted deep judicial tensions, with the majority comprising Trump appointees and the dissent from a Biden appointee. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche praised the decision as ending a politically motivated campaign against department attorneys. This legal resolution concludes a year-long clash over the executive branch's immigration enforcement powers and judicial oversight limits.
Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera