Andrew Forrest Sues Meta Over Fake Ads Using His Likeness
Australian mining billionaire Andrew Forrest has filed a lawsuit in a US federal court in Silicon Valley, seeking to hold Meta accountable for scam advertisements that utilize his likeness without permission. Forrest’s legal team argues that Meta should not be protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which typically shields internet platforms from liability for user-generated content. The suit contends that Meta’s artificial intelligence tools actively optimized and distributed these fraudulent ads, making the company a participant rather than a mere intermediary. Since 2019, thousands of deceptive ads featuring Forrest have promoted fake cryptocurrency schemes, victimizing numerous individuals. The case draws parallels to a recent Los Angeles jury verdict that found Meta liable for harmful platform design. Meta defends its position by stating it made reasonable efforts to preserve data and that the ads were not its direct doing. A judge is expected to rule on Forrest’s motion regarding evidence preservation and immunity in the coming weeks, marking a significant test for tech liability laws.
Wire timeline
Andrew Forrest Sues Meta Over Fake Ads Using His Likeness
Australian mining billionaire Andrew Forrest has filed a lawsuit in a US federal court in Silicon Valley, seeking to hold Meta accountable for scam advertisements that utilize his likeness without permission. Forrest’s legal team argues that Meta should not be protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which typically shields internet platforms from liability for user-generated content. The suit contends that Meta’s artificial intelligence tools actively optimized and distributed these fraudulent ads, making the company a participant rather than a mere intermediary. Since 2019, thousands of deceptive ads featuring Forrest have promoted fake cryptocurrency schemes, victimizing numerous individuals. The case draws parallels to a recent Los Angeles jury verdict that found Meta liable for harmful platform design. Meta defends its position by stating it made reasonable efforts to preserve data and that the ads were not its direct doing. A judge is expected to rule on Forrest’s motion regarding evidence preservation and immunity in the coming weeks, marking a significant test for tech liability laws.
Just In